ArticleJAMA neurology2024
Batoclimab vs Placebo for Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in JAMA neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05039190 (A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Seamless and Group Sequential Phase 2/3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HBM9161), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Seamless and Group Sequential Phase 2/3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HBM9161 (HL161) Subcutaneous Injection in Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Age and Treatment Efficacy in Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.European journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Various Monoclonal Antibodies in Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of complement inhibitors and FcRn blockers in generalized AChR antibody-positive myasthenia gravis: a meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and acceptability of novel biologics in the treatment of myasthenia gravis: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.Systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies in adults with myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Initiation response, maximized therapeutic efficacy, and post-treatment effects of biological targeted therapies in myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Antibodies to watch in 2026.mAbs · 2026Review
- Rapid Serum IgG Reduction as a Potential Indicator of Short-Term Clinical Improvement in AChR-Ab-Positive Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase III Batoclimab Trial.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Regimen-stratified Bayesian model-based meta-analysis of targeted biologics in generalised myasthenia gravis: efficacy comparison, mechanism-level class contrast, and endpoint sensitivity with model-informed trial design.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- B Cells and B Cell Depletion in Autoimmunity and Atherosclerosis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Burden of Disease in Myasthenia Gravis: A Targeted Literature Review.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- CSL305: A Dual Functional Therapeutic Antibody Targeting Complement C2 and FcRn.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Current status and challenges of biologic targeted therapy for myasthenia gravis in China.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2026Review
- Rapid efficacy of efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis patients in acute exacerbations/worsening: multicenter real-world retrospective study.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Research Progress in Pharmacological Targeted Therapy for Myasthenia Gravis.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Digital assessment in myasthenia gravis: evidence, validation, and a proposed framework for autoimmune heterogeneity, remote monitoring, and clinical endpoints.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Antibodies to watch in 2025.mAbs · 2025Review
- Measuring efficacy for myasthenia gravis treatments: A review of biomarkers used in clinical trials.Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Immunological Targets in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis Treatment: Where Are We Going Now?Brain sciences · 2025Review
- CD19xCD3 T cell engager blinatumomab effective in refractory generalized myasthenic syndromes.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is caused by autoantibodies that disrupt the neuromuscular junction. The neonatal fragment crystallizable receptor (FcRn) antagonists, efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab, reduce immunoglobulin G (IgG) level in the circulation and alleviate symptoms in patients with generalized MG. Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety profile of batoclimab, a monoclonal IgG1 antibody, in patients with generalized MG. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted from September 15, 2021, to June 29, 2022, at 27 centers in China. Adult patients 18 years or older with generalized MG were screened, and those who were antibody positive were enrolled. Intervention: Eligible patients received batoclimab or matching placebo in addition to standard of care. Each treatment cycle consisted of 6 weekly subcutaneous injections of batoclimab, 680 mg, or matching placebo followed by 4 weeks of observation. A second treatment cycle was conducted in patients who required continuing treatment. Main Outcome and Measure: The primary outcome was sustained improvement, as defined by a 3-point or greater reduction in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score from baseline for 4 or more consecutive weeks in the first cycle in individuals who were positive for acetylcholine receptor or muscle-specific kinase antibodies. Results: A total of 178 adult patients with generalized MG were screened, 132 were randomly assigned, 131 tested positive for antibodies, and 1 tested negative for antibodies. A total of 132 patients (mean [SE] age, 43.8 [13.6] years; 88 women [67.2%]) were enrolled. The rate of sustained MG-ADL improvement in the first cycle in antibody-positive patients was 31.3% (20 of 64) in the placebo group vs 58.2% (39 of 67) in the batoclimab group (odds ratio, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.62-7.35; P = .001). The MG-ADL score diverged between the 2 groups as early as week 2. The mean (SE) maximum difference in MG-ADL score reduction occurred 1 week after the last dose (day 43, 1.7 [0.3] in the placebo group vs 3.6 [0.3] in the batoclimab group; group difference, -1.9; 95% CI, -2.8 to -1.0; nominal P < .001). The rates of treatment-related and severe treatment-emergent adverse events in patients were 36.9% (24 of 65) and 7.7% (5 of 65) in the placebo group vs 70.1% (47 of 67) and 3.0% (2 of 67) in the batoclimab group, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Batoclimab increased the rate of sustained MG-ADL improvement and was well tolerated in adult patients with generalized MG. Clinical effects and the extent of IgG reduction were similar to those previously reported for efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab. Future studies of large sample size are needed to further understand the safety profile of batoclimab. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05039190.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.