ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024
Pattern classification of interstitial lung diseases from computed tomography images using a ResNet-based network with a split-transform-merge strategy and split attention.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving Tree-Based Lung Disease Classification from Chest X-Ray Images Using Deep Feature Representations.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), accurate pattern assessment from their computed tomography (CT) images could help track lung abnormalities and evaluate treatment efficacy. Based on excellent image classification performance, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been massively investigated for classifying and labeling pathological patterns in the CT images of ILD patients. However, previous studies rarely considered the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the pathological patterns of ILD and used two-dimensional network input. In addition, ResNet-based networks such as SE-ResNet and ResNeXt with high classification performance have not been used for pattern classification of ILD. This study proposed a SE-ResNeXt-SA-18 for classifying pathological patterns of ILD. The SE-ResNeXt-SA-18 integrated the multipath design of the ResNeXt and the feature weighting of the squeeze-and-excitation network with split attention. The classification performance of the SE-ResNeXt-SA-18 was compared with the ResNet-18 and SE-ResNeXt-18. The influence of the input patch size on classification performance was also evaluated. Results show that the classification accuracy was increased with the increase of the patch size. With a 32 × 32 × 16 input, the SE-ResNeXt-SA-18 presented the highest performance with average accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.991, 0.979, and 0.994. High-weight regions in the class activation maps of the SE-ResNeXt-SA-18 also matched the specific pattern features. In comparison, the performance of the SE-ResNeXt-SA-18 is superior to the previously reported CNNs in classifying the ILD patterns. We concluded that the SE-ResNeXt-SA-18 could help track or monitor the progress of ILD through accuracy pattern classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38436886What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.