Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38436798›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2024

Influx of zwitterionic buffer after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) membrane piercing alters the transcriptome of human oocytes.

Robert J Mendola, Leelabati Biswas, Karen Schindler, Renee H Walmsley, Helena Russell, Marlane Angle, G John Garrisi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ESHRE recommendations on Good Practice in the IVF laboratory†.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Guideline
  2. ICSI media buffers: is there room for improvement?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert J MendolaInstitute for Reproductive Medicine and Science (IRMS) at Saint Barnabas, Livingston, NJ, USA. Bmendy01@msn.com.
Leelabati BiswasDepartment of Genetics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Karen SchindlerDepartment of Genetics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Renee H WalmsleyInstitute for Reproductive Medicine and Science (IRMS) at Saint Barnabas, Livingston, NJ, USA.
Helena RussellEastern Virginia Medical School (EVMS), Norfolk, VA, USA.
Marlane AngleEastern Virginia Medical School (EVMS), Norfolk, VA, USA.
G John GarrisiInstitute for Reproductive Medicine and Science (IRMS) at Saint Barnabas, Livingston, NJ, USA.
Saint Barnabas Medical Center · USEastern Virginia Medical School · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

IMSD at Rutgers - New Brunswick (Renewal)T32GM139804 · NIGMS · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Brian Daniels, JAMES H. MILLONIG · 2021 to 2026
$2.9M
Functional evaluation of kinesin gene variants associated with female subfertility and egg aneuploidy.F30HD107976 · NICHD · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI BISWAS, LEELABATI · 2022 to 2025
$202k
NICHD NIH HHS F30 HD107976NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM139804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose/study questionDoes piercing oocyte membranes during ICSI allow the influx of surrounding zwitterionic buffer into human oocytes and result in altered developmental competence?

methodsHuman oocytes directed to IRB-approved research were used to determine the unrestricted influx of surrounding buffer into the oocyte after piercing of membranes via confocal fluorescence microscopy (n = 80 human MII oocytes) and the influence of the select buffer influx of HEPES, MOPS, and bicarbonate buffer on the oocyte transcriptome using ultra-low input RNA sequencing (n = 40 human MII oocytes).

resultsPiercing membranes of human MII oocytes during sham-ICSI resulted in the unrestricted influx of surrounding culture buffer into the oocyte that was beyond technician control. Transcriptome analysis revealed statistically significant decreased cytoskeletal transcripts in the pierced buffer cohorts, higher levels of embryo competency transcripts (IGF2 and G6PD) in the bicarbonate buffer cohort, higher levels of stress-induced transcriptional repressor transcripts (MAF1) in the HEPES and MOPS cohorts, and decreased levels of numerous chromosomal maintenance transcripts (SMC3) in the HEPES buffer cohort. The HEPES buffer cohort also revealed higher levels of transcripts suggesting increased oxidative (GPX1) and lysosomal stress (LAMP1).

conclusionThe influence of zwitterionic buffer on intrinsic cellular mechanisms provides numerous concerns for their use in IVF clinical applications. The primary concern is the ICSI procedure, in which the surrounding buffer is allowed influx into the oocytes after membrane piercing. Selecting a physiological bicarbonate buffer may reduce imposed stress on oocytes, resulting in improved embryo development and clinical results because intracellular MOPS, and especially HEPES, may negatively impact intrinsic biological mechanisms, as revealed by transcriptome changes. These findings further support the utilization of bicarbonate buffer as the oocyte-holding medium during ICSI.

Indexed as

OocytesSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicTranscriptomeAdultBuffersEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleFertilization in VitroHEPESHumansMaleBuffersHEPESBicarbonate buffer ICSIHEPESICSIMOPSOocyte transcriptomeZwitterionic buffer

Identifiers

PMID38436798
PMCPMC11143126
OpenAlexW4392362147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.