ArticlePeerJ2024
Construction and validation of m6A-related diagnostic model for psoriasis.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulation of mCell biology and toxicology · 2026Review
- Integrative single-cell transcriptomic and epitranscriptomic analysis of the RBM15-m6A-IL10 regulatory axis in psoriatic keratinocytes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Epitranscriptomic regulation by m6A in immunity and autoimmune disorders: emerging mechanisms and clinical perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Genetic analysis of potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets in hypoxia and pyroptosis from psoriasis.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Article
- Research on RNA modification in disease diagnosis and prognostic biomarkers: current status and challenges.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- RNA NCell death & disease · 2025Article
- The Role of MClinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is involved in numerous biological processes in both normal and diseased states. Herein, we aimed to explore the potential role of m6A regulators in the diagnosis of psoriasis and predict molecular mechanisms by which m6A regulators impact psoriasis. Methods: GSE30999 (170 human skin tissue samples) and GSE13355 (180 human skin tissue samples) were downloaded as the training analysis dataset and validation dataset respectively. M6A-related genes were obtained from the literature and their expression levels in GSE30999 samples were measured to identify M6A-related DEGs between psoriasis lesions (LS) and non-lesional lesions (NL). We identified m6A-related DEGs using differential expression analysis and assessed their interactions through correlation analysis and network construction. A logistic regression analysis followed by LASSO optimization was employed to select m6A-related DEGs for the construction of a diagnostic model. The performance of the model was validated using support vector machine (SVM) methodology with sigmoid kernel function and extensive cross-validation. Additionally, the correlation between m6A-related DEGs and immune cell infiltration was analyzed, as well as the association of these DEGs with psoriasis subtypes. Functional analysis of the m6A-related DEGs included the construction of regulatory networks involving miRNAs, transcription factors (TFs), and small-molecule drugs. The m6A modification patterns were also explored by examining the gene expression differences between psoriasis subtypes and their enriched biological pathways. Finally, the expression of significant m6A regulators involved in the diagnostic model was examined by RT-qPCR. Results: In this study, ten optimal m6A-related DEGs were identified, including FTO, IGF2BP2, METTL3, YTHDC1, ZC3H13, HNRNPC, IGF2BP3, LRPPRC, YTHDC2, and HNRNPA2B1. A diagnostic model based on these m6A-related DEGs was constructed, demonstrating high diagnostic accuracy with an area under the curve (AUC) in GSE30999 and GSE13355 of 0.974 and 0.730, respectively. Meanwhile, the expression level of m6A regulators verified by RT-qPCR was consistent with the results in GSE30999. The infiltration of activated mast cells and NK cells was significantly associated with all ten m6A-related DEGs in psoriasis. Among them, YTHDC1, HNRNPC, and FTO were targeted by most miRNAs and were regulated by nine related TFs. Therefore, patients may benefit from dorsomorphin and cyclosporine therapy. Between the two subgroups, 1,592 DEGs were identified, including LRPPRC and METTL3. These DEGs were predicted to be involved in neutrophil activation, cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions, and chemokine signaling pathways. Conclusions: A diagnostic model based on ten m6A-related DEGs in patients with psoriasis was constructed, which may provide early diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for psoriasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.