ArticlePeerJ2024
Enhancing medical image segmentation with a multi-transformer U-Net.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spinal disease image segmentation technology integrating U-ResNet and shape-aware attention.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- IDCC-SAM: A Zero-Shot Approach for Cell Counting in Immunocytochemistry Dataset Using the Segment Anything Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Flood change detection model based on an improved U-net network and multi-head attention mechanism.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Applications, image analysis, and interpretation of computer vision in medical imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
- Joint segmentation of sternocleidomastoid and skeletal muscles in computed tomography images using a multiclass learning approach.Radiological physics and technology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various segmentation networks based on Swin Transformer have shown promise in medical segmentation tasks. Nonetheless, challenges such as lower accuracy and slower training convergence have persisted. To tackle these issues, we introduce a novel approach that combines the Swin Transformer and Deformable Transformer to enhance overall model performance. We leverage the Swin Transformer's window attention mechanism to capture local feature information and employ the Deformable Transformer to adjust sampling positions dynamically, accelerating model convergence and aligning it more closely with object shapes and sizes. By amalgamating both Transformer modules and incorporating additional skip connections to minimize information loss, our proposed model excels at rapidly and accurately segmenting CT or X-ray lung images. Experimental results demonstrate the remarkable, showcasing the significant prowess of our model. It surpasses the performance of the standalone Swin Transformer's Swin Unet and converges more rapidly under identical conditions, yielding accuracy improvements of 0.7% (resulting in 88.18%) and 2.7% (resulting in 98.01%) on the COVID-19 CT scan lesion segmentation dataset and Chest X-ray Masks and Labels dataset, respectively. This advancement has the potential to aid medical practitioners in early diagnosis and treatment decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.