ArticleCureus2024
Stress Distribution on Maxillary Canines Following Restoration With Different Dimensions of Metal and Fiber Posts: A Finite Element Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction In recent times, finite element analysis (FEA) in the field of dentistry has been employed to assess the mechanical properties of biological materials and tissues, which are difficult to quantify directly within a living organism. Only a limited number of studies have examined the impact of post diameter and length on how stress is dispersed in a maxillary canine tooth. Hence, this in vitro investigation was conducted to analyze the distribution of stress in a maxillary canine tooth that was replaced using metal and fiber posts with different diameters (1.5 mm and 1.8 mm) and lengths (11 mm and 15 mm), applying FEA. Materials and methods A FEA study was performed and all models were grouped as follows: Models 1 and 5 were made of titanium (Ti) and glass fiber posts, respectively, with a diameter of 1.5 mm and a length of 15 mm with composite core and all-ceramic crown; Models 2 and 6 were made of Ti and glass fiber posts, respectively, with a diameter of 1.5 mm and a length of 11 mm with composite core and all-ceramic crown; Models 3 and 7 were made of Ti and glass fiber posts, respectively, with a diameter of 1.8 mm and a length of 15 mm with composite core and all-ceramic crown; and Models 4 and 8 were made of Ti and glass fiber posts, respectively, with a diameter of 1.8 mm and a length of 11 mm with composite core and all-ceramic crown. A force of 200 N was exerted on the ceramic crown at an angulation of 45° to the longitudinal axis of the tooth on the palatal surface above the cingulum. The failure was determined by the correlation between a larger von Mises stress estimate and an increased likelihood of failure. The resulting stresses were then contrasted with the highest possible tensile strength of the material. Results The study demonstrated that fiber posts with a diameter of 1.8 mm and an average length of 11 mm exhibited reduced stress levels in comparison to Ti posts. The largest stresses were seen at the cervical region of the tooth, regardless of the materials employed. There was no discernible alteration in stress when the length and diameter of the post were modified. The highest stress in the composite core was measured in Ti posts measuring 1.5 mm in diameter and 15 mm in length. The highest level of stress on dentin was noted in cases where a fiber post was used, as opposed to cases where a Ti post was used. The measured stress within the fiber post was insignificant. However, the pressures imparted to the dentin were greater and more uniformly distributed in comparison to the Ti post cases. Conclusion It is suggested that a composite resin core be used along with a fiber post that is larger in diameter and smaller in length, within clinical bounds, in order to lessen stress in the radicular tooth, despite the substantial coronal defect. Further clinical trials are required to assess the survival rate of these specific measurements, dimensions, and biomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.