ArticleCureus2024
Unraveling Factors Shaping the Acceptance and Non-acceptance of Non-scalpel Vasectomy in Rural Central India: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background India, with a population exceeding 1.43 billion, faces significant demographic challenges, necessitating effective family planning measures. Non-scalpel vasectomy (NSV) is a less complex and cost-effective male contraceptive, yet its acceptance remains low, especially compared to female sterilization. Understanding the determinants of NSV acceptance is crucial for informed decisions on family planning methods. Methods This cross-sectional study investigated NSV acceptance among males who underwent non-scalpel vasectomy (acceptors of NSV) and spouses of women who underwent tubectomy (non-acceptors of NSV). The study was conducted among 116 NSV acceptors and 116 non-acceptors from rural Central India. Data were collected over six months, employing a pre-designed questionnaire covering socio-demographic details, reasons for acceptance/non-acceptance, and information sources for the same. Statistical analysis was done utilizing Epi Info 7.2.6 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], Atlanta, GA), employing descriptive statistics and tests of association. Results Significant associations were found between NSV acceptance (p<0.05) and the age and education of study subjects, age of wife, duration since marriage, and total number of children. Incentives also played a significant role (p=0.014). Opposition to NSV, mainly from wives, was a key factor for non-acceptance (38%). Reasons for acceptance included a previous cesarean section (40.52%), the simplicity of the NSV procedure (26.72%), and the wife's illness (23.28%). Non-acceptance reasons comprised family/friend opposition (38%), lack of awareness/ignorance (25.00%), and fear of surgery (23.28%). Study subjects perceived community reluctance to NSV as mainly due to misbeliefs (30.17%), fear of surgery (27.58%), and illiteracy (26.29%). Conclusion The study highlights socio-demographic factors influencing NSV acceptance and identifies key reasons for acceptance/non-acceptance. Community-based interventions, increased advertisement, and health provider counseling were suggested for enhancing acceptance. Despite challenges, participant satisfaction with NSV was high. These findings contribute to understanding the complex dynamics surrounding NSV acceptance in rural Central India, informing future family planning strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.