ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2024
Microfluidic chip as a promising evaluation method in assisted reproduction: A systematic review.
Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microfluidic chips in female reproduction: a systematic review of status, advances, and challenges.Theranostics · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Reproductive Bioengineering: Integrating Fertility Diagnostics, Organ-on-Chip Systems, Cryobiology and Epigenetic Safety for Precision Reproductive Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From Cytoskeletal Remodeling to Oocyte Quality: The Emerging Role of Mechanics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Recent advances in sex-specific reproductive microphysiological systems for the systematic evaluation of assisted reproductive technology.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Towards cervical AI of sheep with stored semen: latest insights and future developments.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
- Dynamic microdevice culture during bovine oocyte maturation decreases lipid accumulation and improve blastocyst cell numbers.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Gut microbiota in anxiety and depression: mechanisms, drug interactions, and therapeutic implications.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2025Review
- Advancements in Sonication-Based Extraction Techniques for Ovarian Follicular Fluid Analysis: Implications for Infertility Diagnostics and Assisted Reproductive Technologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A Narrative Review on the Sperm Selection Methods in Assisted Reproductive Technology: Out with the New, the Old Is Better?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Bioengineering Approaches for Male Infertility: From Microenvironmental Regeneration to in vitro Fertilization.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- Sperm quality analyzer: A portable LED array microscope with dark-field imaging.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024Article
- Microfluidic chip as a promising evaluation method in assisted reproduction: A systematic review.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of assisted reproductive technology (ART) is to select the high-quality sperm, oocytes, and embryos, and finally achieve a successful pregnancy. However, functional evaluation is hindered by intra- and inter-operator variability. Microfluidic chips emerge as the one of the most powerful tools to analyze biological samples for reduced size, precise control, and flexible extension. Herein, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and IEEE Xplore databases until March 2023. We displayed and prospected all detection strategies based on microfluidics in the ART field. After full-text screening, 71 studies were identified as eligible for inclusion. The percentages of human and mouse studies equaled with 31.5%. The prominent country in terms of publication number was the USA (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.