ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2024
Unleashing the potential of fNIRS with machine learning: classification of fine anatomical movements to empower future brain-computer interface.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hand movements prediction via fNIRS and AI algorithms.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Prefrontal fNIRS hemodynamic correlates of attentional load during rapid serial visual presentation tasks.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Exploring cognitive load in anatomy education: a study of 3D virtual reality and 2D learning environments using fNIRS.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Open access individual finger movement dataset with fNIRS.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- A game-theoretic framework for multimodal information utilization under heterogeneous processing environments in neuroscience and perception science.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Functional near-infrared spectroscopy for the detection of fear using parameterized quantum circuits.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Hemodynamic Monitoring of Simulated Bruxism Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: A Preliminary Study.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- TopoTempNet: A High-Accuracy and Interpretable Decoding Method for fNIRS-Based Motor Imagery.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Applications and advances of combined fMRI-fNIRs techniques in brain functional research.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Prefrontal cortex activity during binocular color fusion and rivalry: an fNIRS study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we explore the potential of using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals in conjunction with modern machine-learning techniques to classify specific anatomical movements to increase the number of control commands for a possible fNIRS-based brain-computer interface (BCI) applications. The study focuses on novel individual finger-tapping, a well-known task in fNIRS and fMRI studies, but limited to left/right or few fingers. Twenty-four right-handed participants performed the individual finger-tapping task. Data were recorded by using sixteen sources and detectors placed over the motor cortex according to the 10-10 international system. The event's average oxygenated Δ HbO and deoxygenated Δ HbR hemoglobin data were utilized as features to assess the performance of diverse machine learning (ML) models in a challenging multi-class classification setting. These methods include LDA, QDA, MNLR, XGBoost, and RF. A new DL-based model named "Hemo-Net" has been proposed which consists of multiple parallel convolution layers with different filters to extract the features. This paper aims to explore the efficacy of using fNRIS along with ML/DL methods in a multi-class classification task. Complex models like RF, XGBoost, and Hemo-Net produce relatively higher test set accuracy when compared to LDA, MNLR, and QDA. Hemo-Net has depicted a superior performance achieving the highest test set accuracy of 76%, however, in this work, we do not aim at improving the accuracies of models rather we are interested in exploring if fNIRS has the neural signatures to help modern ML/DL methods in multi-class classification which can lead to applications like brain-computer interfaces. Multi-class classification of fine anatomical movements, such as individual finger movements, is difficult to classify with fNIRS data. Traditional ML models like MNLR and LDA show inferior performance compared to the ensemble-based methods of RF and XGBoost. DL-based method Hemo-Net outperforms all methods evaluated in this study and demonstrates a promising future for fNIRS-based BCI applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.