ArticleData in brief2024
A synthetic dataset of different chart types for advancements in chart identification and visualization.
Article in Data in brief, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A synthetic dataset of different chart types for advancements in chart identification and visualization.Data in brief · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce a meticulously curated synthetic chart dataset designed to propel algorithm advancements in data visualization and interpretation. The dataset, tailored for training and testing purposes, encompasses a diverse array of chart types, including but not limited to Area, Bar, Box, Donut, Line, Pie, and Scatter. The data collection process involves a fully automatic low-level algorithm focused on extraction of graphical elements. The algorithm ensures efficiency by restricting input images from featuring three-dimensional representations, incorporating any 3D effects, or including multiple charts in a single image. The dataset is categorized into training and testing subsets, further subdivided based on resolutions and specific chart types. The reuse potential of this dataset is substantial. It serves as a valuable resource for driving algorithmic advancements in data visualization classification and interpretation. Researchers can leverage this dataset for training and testing deep models, enhancing the adaptability of their algorithms. Moreover, it establishes a benchmark for evaluating system performance in handling diverse chart visualizations, allowing for direct comparisons, and fostering advancements in data understanding algorithms. The versatility of the dataset, encapsulating various chart types and resolutions, provides a standardized platform for assessing and comparing the effectiveness of different systems in understanding and decomposing visualizations [1,2,3].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.