Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38435665›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2024

Comparative evaluation of nebulised dexmedetomidine vs fentanyl for the treatment of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in parturients after caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: A randomised controlled study.

Amarjeet Kumar, Chandni Sinha, Kunal Singh, Monika Anant, Ajeet Kumar, Poonam Kumari

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amarjeet KumarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4272-5750
Chandni SinhaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4107-2671
Kunal SinghDepartment of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4485-8757
Monika AnantDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7957-379X
Ajeet KumarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1464-6684
Poonam KumariDepartment of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0118-2187
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: The incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) following spinal anaesthesia in the obstetric population is around 0.5%-2%. Hydration, bed rest, caffeine, paracetamol, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, epidural blood patches, etc., are the various modalities used for its management. This study aims to compare nebulised dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl for the treatment of PDPH in parturients after caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Methods: Ninety obstetric patients aged 18-35 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II/III and suffering from PDPH as per the criteria of the International Headache Society after caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were recruited in this double-blinded randomised study. Patients were randomised to Group D (dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg nebulisation), Group F (fentanyl 1 µg/kg nebulisation), and Group S (saline nebulisation 4mL). The nebulisation was done 12 hourly for 72 hours. Assessment parameters included pain score and the requirement of additional treatment such as paracetamol, caffeine, and epidural blood patch. Analysis of variance test was used for continuous quantitative variables, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for quantitative discrete data. Results: The pain scores at 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours following nebulisation were significantly lower in Group D in comparison to groups F and S ( Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine nebulisation resulted in effective reduction in PDPH symptoms and pain scores. Nebulisation with fentanyl did not alleviate PDPH symptoms when compared to the control group.

Indexed as

Caesarean sectiondexmedetomidinefentanylnebulisationobstetric anaesthesiaPDPHpost-dural puncture headachespinal anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID38435665
PMCPMC10903780
OpenAlexW4391277536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.