ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2024
Investigation into the clinical performance of rectus sheath block in reducing postoperative pain following surgical intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07545824 (Association Between Ultrasound-Derived Rectus Abdominis Muscle Thickness and Thickening Fraction and Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Association Between Ultrasound-Derived Rectus Abdominis Muscle Thickness and Thickening Fraction and Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Respiratory effects of rectus sheath block in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- The role of the rectus sheath block in modern perioperative care for midline laparotomy: a review of the evidence.Frontiers in anesthesiology · 2026Article
- In Search of Ideal Analgesia: Classical and Deep Rectus Sheath Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.Local and regional anesthesia · 2026Review
- Article
- Comparison between opioid-based anaesthesia technique and opioid-free anaesthesia technique in patients undergoing laparotomy for gynaecological malignancy: A randomised controlled trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Comparison of erector spinae plane block and rectus sheath block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A retrospective non-inferiority study.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Ultrasound‑Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Oblique Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2025Article
- Trial sequential analysis: Quality improvement for meta-analysis.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2024Article
- Rectus sheath block as the sole anesthesia technique for open surgical repair of umbilical hernias: A retrospective cohort study.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Rectus sheath block (RSB) is an effective postoperative pain control technique in abdominal surgical procedures. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and outcome data of patients undergoing RSB compared to the standard of care in both laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Methods: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022372596). The search was restricted to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RSB effectiveness on postoperative pain to any standard general anaesthesia technique (control). We systematically explored PubMed, Medline, Central, Scopus and Web of Science for RCTs from inception to September 2023. The primary outcome was the evaluation of pain scores at rest 0-2, 10-12 and 12-24 h postoperatively. The secondary outcome was the analysis of postoperative intravenous (IV) morphine equivalent consumption at 24-h. A risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (ROB 2.0, Cochrane, Copenhagen, Denmark) assessment and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE, Cochrane, Copenhagen, Denmark) analysis was conducted to evaluate the quality of the RCTs. Results: Twenty RCTs involving 708 participants who received RSB intervention and 713 who received alternative analgesic care were included. RSB pain scores were significantly lower than control at 0-2 h ( Conclusion: RSB implementation was associated with reduced postoperative pain scores and decreased opioid consumption in IV morphine equivalency up to 24 h following surgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.