Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38435659›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2024

Investigation into the clinical performance of rectus sheath block in reducing postoperative pain following surgical intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Sean D Jeffries, Robert Harutyunyan, Joshua Morse, Thomas M Hemmerling

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07545824 (Association Between Ultrasound-Derived Rectus Abdominis Muscle Thickness and Thickening Fraction and Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07545824 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Association Between Ultrasound-Derived Rectus Abdominis Muscle Thickness and Thickening Fraction and Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorIstinye UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled62ConditionsPostoperative PainArmsUltrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sean D JeffriesDepartment of Experimental Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montréal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5079-5380
Robert HarutyunyanDepartment of Experimental Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montréal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0982-6741
Joshua MorseDepartment of Experimental Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montréal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4747-2418
Thomas M HemmerlingDepartment of Experimental Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montréal, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1447-0703
McGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Rectus sheath block (RSB) is an effective postoperative pain control technique in abdominal surgical procedures. This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and outcome data of patients undergoing RSB compared to the standard of care in both laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Methods: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022372596). The search was restricted to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RSB effectiveness on postoperative pain to any standard general anaesthesia technique (control). We systematically explored PubMed, Medline, Central, Scopus and Web of Science for RCTs from inception to September 2023. The primary outcome was the evaluation of pain scores at rest 0-2, 10-12 and 12-24 h postoperatively. The secondary outcome was the analysis of postoperative intravenous (IV) morphine equivalent consumption at 24-h. A risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (ROB 2.0, Cochrane, Copenhagen, Denmark) assessment and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE, Cochrane, Copenhagen, Denmark) analysis was conducted to evaluate the quality of the RCTs. Results: Twenty RCTs involving 708 participants who received RSB intervention and 713 who received alternative analgesic care were included. RSB pain scores were significantly lower than control at 0-2 h ( Conclusion: RSB implementation was associated with reduced postoperative pain scores and decreased opioid consumption in IV morphine equivalency up to 24 h following surgical intervention.

Indexed as

Abdominal surgerypostoperative painrectus sheath blockregional anaesthesiasystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38435659
PMCPMC10903772
OpenAlexW4391277548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.