Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38435622›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

LSTMDD: an optimized LSTM-based drift detector for concept drift in dynamic cloud computing.

Tajwar Mehmood, Seemab Latif, Nor Shahida Mohd Jamail, Asad Malik, Rabia Latif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tajwar MehmoodSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (SEECS), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Seemab LatifSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (SEECS), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-5801-1568
Nor Shahida Mohd JamailArtificial Intelligence and Data Analytics Laboratory, College of Computer and Information Sciences (CCIS), Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Asad MalikSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (SEECS), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3804-997X
Rabia LatifArtificial Intelligence and Data Analytics Laboratory, College of Computer and Information Sciences (CCIS), Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5304-5948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the problem of concept drift in cloud computing and emphasizes the importance of early detection for enabling optimum resource utilization and offering an effective solution. The analysis includes synthetic and real-world cloud datasets, stressing the need for appropriate drift detectors tailored to the cloud domain. A modified version of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) called the LSTM Drift Detector (LSTMDD) is proposed and compared with other top drift detection techniques using prediction error as the primary evaluation metric. LSTMDD is optimized to improve performance in detecting anomalies in non-Gaussian distributed cloud environments. The experiments show that LSTMDD outperforms other methods for gradual and sudden drift in the cloud domain. The findings suggest that machine learning techniques such as LSTMDD could be a promising approach to addressing the problem of concept drift in cloud computing, leading to more efficient resource allocation and improved performance.

Indexed as

Cloud usage traceConcept driftCPU usageDrift detectionMachine learningMemory usage

Identifiers

PMID38435622
PMCPMC10909158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.