ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Arrhythmia classification for non-experts using infinite impulse response (IIR)-filter-based machine learning and deep learning models of the electrocardiogram.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arrhythmias are a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Portable electrocardiogram (ECG) monitors have been used for decades to monitor patients with arrhythmias. These monitors provide real-time data on cardiac activity to identify irregular heartbeats. However, rhythm monitoring and wave detection, especially in the 12-lead ECG, make it difficult to interpret the ECG analysis by correlating it with the condition of the patient. Moreover, even experienced practitioners find ECG analysis challenging. All of this is due to the noise in ECG readings and the frequencies at which the noise occurs. The primary objective of this research is to remove noise and extract features from ECG signals using the proposed infinite impulse response (IIR) filter to improve ECG quality, which can be better understood by non-experts. For this purpose, this study used ECG signal data from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Beth Israel Hospital (MIT-BIH) database. This allows the acquired data to be easily evaluated using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models and classified as rhythms. To achieve accurate results, we applied hyperparameter (HP)-tuning for ML classifiers and fine-tuning (FT) for DL models. This study also examined the categorization of arrhythmias using different filters and the changes in accuracy. As a result, when all models were evaluated, DenseNet-121 without FT achieved 99% accuracy, while FT showed better results with 99.97% accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.