ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Advancing brain tumor detection: harnessing the Swin Transformer's power for accurate classification and performance analysis.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- BRAIN-META: A reproducible CNN-vision transformer meta-ensemble pipeline for explainable brain tumor classification.MethodsX · 2026Article
- A Robust ConvNeXt-Based Framework for Efficient, Generalizable, and Explainable Brain Tumor Classification on MRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep Learning for Brain Tumour Analysis: A Systematic Review of CNN-Transformer Hybrids in Multimodal Imaging.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026Review
- Global-local feature fusion: a robust hybrid deep learning model for multiclass brain tumor classification with Grad-CAM++ interpretation.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- BrainFusionNet: an attention-augmented deep convolutional framework with hybrid loss optimisation and test-time augmentation for multi-class brain tumour detection in magnetic resonance images.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Advances in artificial intelligence and thermal analysis for brain tumor detection: a review of models, methods, and modalities.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Sparse transformer and multipath decision tree: a novel approach for efficient brain tumor classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced glioma tumor detection and segmentation using modified deep learning with edge fusion and frequency features.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- MLG: a mixed local and global model for brain tumor classification.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- EnSLDe: an enhanced short-range and long-range dependent system for brain tumor classification.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Unveiling the capabilities of vision transformers in sperm morphology analysis: a comparative evaluation.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Challenges and Advances in Classifying Brain Tumors: An Overview of Machine, Deep Learning, and Hybrid Approaches with Future Perspectives in Medical Imaging.Current medical imaging · 2025Review
- Integrating deep learning and thermal estimation for enhanced MRI-based brain tumor diagnosis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate detection of brain tumors through medical imaging is paramount for precise diagnoses and effective treatment strategies. In this study, we introduce an innovative and robust methodology that capitalizes on the transformative potential of the Swin Transformer architecture for meticulous brain tumor image classification. Our approach handles the classification of brain tumors across four distinct categories: glioma, meningioma, non-tumor, and pituitary, leveraging a dataset comprising 2,870 images. Employing the Swin Transformer architecture, our method intricately integrates a multifaceted pipeline encompassing sophisticated preprocessing, intricate feature extraction mechanisms, and a highly nuanced classification framework. Utilizing 21 matrices for performance evaluation across all four classes, these matrices provide a detailed insight into the model's behavior throughout the learning process, furthermore showcasing a graphical representation of confusion matrix, training and validation loss and accuracy. The standout performance parameter, accuracy, stands at an impressive 97%. This achievement outperforms established models like CNN, DCNN, ViT, and their variants in brain tumor classification. Our methodology's robustness and exceptional accuracy showcase its potential as a pioneering model in this domain, promising substantial advancements in accurate tumor identification and classification, thereby contributing significantly to the landscape of medical image analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.