ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
A SE-DenseNet-LSTM model for locomotion mode recognition in lower limb exoskeleton.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Active Rehabilitation Technologies for Post-Stroke Patients.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Deep convolutional neural network-based enhanced crowd density monitoring for intelligent urban planning on smart cities.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pattern transition recognition based on transfer learning for exoskeleton across different terrains.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Locomotion mode recognition in humans is fundamental for flexible control in wearable-powered exoskeleton robots. This article proposes a hybrid model that combines a dense convolutional network (DenseNet) and long short-term memory (LSTM) with a channel attention mechanism (SENet) for locomotion mode recognition. DenseNet can automatically extract deep-level features from data, while LSTM effectively captures long-dependent information in time series. To evaluate the validity of the hybrid model, inertial measurement units (IMUs) and pressure sensors were used to obtain motion data from 15 subjects. Five locomotion modes were tested for the hybrid model, such as level ground walking, stair ascending, stair descending, ramp ascending, and ramp descending. Furthermore, the data features of the ramp were inconspicuous, leading to large recognition errors. To address this challenge, the SENet module was incorporated, which improved recognition rates to some extent. The proposed model automatically extracted the features and achieved an average recognition rate of 97.93%. Compared with known algorithms, the proposed model has substantial recognition results and robustness. This work holds promising potential for applications such as limb support and weight bearing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.