ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
exKidneyBERT: a language model for kidney transplant pathology reports and the crucial role of extended vocabularies.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- From assistant to collaborator: A systematic review of the evolution of artificial intelligence in end-stage renal disease care and management.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Sequence structure in children's speech reveals non-linear development of relations between word categories.Communications psychology · 2025Article
- Systematic comparison of GPT models for the analysis of pathology reports in a low-resource language: A case study for Turkish.American journal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- Task-Specific Transformer-Based Language Models in Health Care: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Applications of Large Language Models in Pathology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Application of visual transformer in renal image analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Review
- exKidneyBERT: a language model for kidney transplant pathology reports and the crucial role of extended vocabularies.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pathology reports contain key information about the patient's diagnosis as well as important gross and microscopic findings. These information-rich clinical reports offer an invaluable resource for clinical studies, but data extraction and analysis from such unstructured texts is often manual and tedious. While neural information retrieval systems (typically implemented as deep learning methods for natural language processing) are automatic and flexible, they typically require a large domain-specific text corpus for training, making them infeasible for many medical subdomains. Thus, an automated data extraction method for pathology reports that does not require a large training corpus would be of significant value and utility. Objective: To develop a language model-based neural information retrieval system that can be trained on small datasets and validate it by training it on renal transplant-pathology reports to extract relevant information for two predefined questions: (1) "What kind of rejection does the patient show?"; (2) "What is the grade of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA)?" Methods: Kidney BERT was developed by pre-training Clinical BERT on 3.4K renal transplant pathology reports and 1.5M words. Then, exKidneyBERT was developed by extending Clinical BERT's tokenizer with six technical keywords and repeating the pre-training procedure. This extended the model's vocabulary. All three models were fine-tuned with information retrieval heads. Results: The model with extended vocabulary, exKidneyBERT, outperformed Clinical BERT and Kidney BERT in both questions. For rejection, exKidneyBERT achieved an 83.3% overlap ratio for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and 79.2% for T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR). For IFTA, exKidneyBERT had a 95.8% exact match rate. Conclusion: ExKidneyBERT is a high-performing model for extracting information from renal pathology reports. Additional pre-training of BERT language models on specialized small domains does not necessarily improve performance. Extending the BERT tokenizer's vocabulary library is essential for specialized domains to improve performance, especially when pre-training on small corpora.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.