ArticleACS central science2024
Creation of Cationic Polymeric Nanotrap Featuring High Anion Density and Exceptional Alkaline Stability for Highly Efficient Pertechnetate Removal from Nuclear Waste Streams.
Article in ACS central science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Site-Enriched Quinoline Covalent Organic Frameworks for Selective Palladium Recovery under Acidic Radioactive Media.JACS Au · 2026Article
- In situ molecular weaving of ionic polymers into metal-organic frameworks for radioactive anion capture.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Facile structuring of crystalline porous framework beads for deep purification of nuclear wastewater.National science review · 2025Article
- From Radioactive Effluent to Drinking Water: Efficient Removal of TraceAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Advanced Porous Materials as Designer Platforms for Sequestering Radionuclide Pertechnetate.Chem & bio engineering · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is an urgent need for highly efficient sorbents capable of selectively removing
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.