Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38435475›Full record

ArticleSovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine2023

Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation for Dental Implant Surface Treatment.

A A Muraev, A I Murzabekov, S Yu Ivanov, Yu V Tarasov, E A Orlov, A A Dolgalev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Rapid mineralization of hydrothermally induced TiOJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A A MuraevProfessor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery; Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198, Russia.
A I MurzabekovOral Surgeon, Head of the Center for Medical Care in Dental Diseases; The Central Clinical Hospital with a Polyclinic of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation, 15 Marshal Timoshenko St., Moscow, 121359, Russia.
S Yu IvanovProfessor, Correspondent Member of Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery; Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198, Russia; Head of the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 8/2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991, Russia.
Yu V TarasovGeneral Director; Beta-Tech Medicine LLC, Bldg 1, 42 Bolshoy Boulevard, Mozhaisky District, Skolkovo Innovation Center, Moscow, 121205, Russia.
E A OrlovHead of the Laboratory; Beta-Tech Medicine LLC, Bldg 1, 42 Bolshoy Boulevard, Mozhaisky District, Skolkovo Innovation Center, Moscow, 121205, Russia.
A A DolgalevProfessor, Department of General Dental Practice; Stavropol State Medical University, 310 Mira St., Stavropol, 355017, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current technologies of plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) for modifying the surfaces of dental implants made of the Grade IV titan alloy provide predictable long-term results in implant dentistry. Materials and Methods: 50 IRIS dental implants (Scientific Production Company LICOSTOM, Russia), 10-mm long and 4 mm in diameter, were manufactured from the VT1-0 alloy. The implant surface was treated by two PEO methods: 1) in the aqueous solution of alkaline electrolyte without any additional modifiers (PEO-Ti); 2) in the aqueous solution of orthophosphoric acid-based electrolyte containing calcium carbonate (PEO-Ca). Implants made of VT1-0 alloy after milling and without additional treatment served as control samples. The implant surfaces were studied by electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry. Some of the implants were installed in sheep, samples were obtained at 2, 4, and 8 weeks and studied by microcomputer tomography. Results: Regardless of the electrolyte composition, a highly developed porous surface was formed in the samples with PEO-modified surfaces. The surface of the PEO-Ti samples in a simple unmodified electrolyte was characterized by a large number of open pores with a wide range of size distribution from 200 nm to 3 μm. The pore size distribution was of a monomodal character, with a maximum near 0.23 μm. The PEO samples in the Ca-containing electrolyte had pores also in a wide range from ~80 nm to ~7 μm. The pore distribution, in contrast to PEO-Ti, was bimodal in nature, with the main maximum in the region of 1.05 μm and the concomitant maximum near 2.45 μm.The obtained surfaces of both types (PEO with Ca and Ti) possessed high purity and optimal microroughness for osseointegration. Both types of PEO treatment (PEO with Ca and Ti) have demonstrated a similar osseointegrative potential, nevertheless, the surface of the PEO-Ca showed a better contact with the implant surface (49.8%) than PEO-Ti (42.4%) obviously due to the presence of calcium in its composition. Conclusion: The PEO-formed implant surfaces demonstrate high osseointegrative properties after any variants of treatment and show the potential for application in osteoporosis.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsAlloysAnimalsCalcium CarbonateCalcium, DietaryElectrolytesSheepAlloysCalcium CarbonateCalcium, DietaryDental ImplantsElectrolytescalcium hydroxyphosphatedental implanthydroxyapatiteimplant surface treatment techniquesosteointegrationplasma electrolytic oxidation

Identifiers

PMID38435475
PMCPMC10904360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.