Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38435461›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

Microsurgical Practice with Use of Smartphone Camera as the Microscopic Field.

Elise A Johnson, R Michael Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elise A JohnsonFrom the Ross University School of Medicine, Bridgetown, Barbados.
R Michael JohnsonDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accessibility of microsurgical equipment is a major barrier to proper training of surgeons before live patient free flap surgery. A technique is presented that uses a smartphone camera as the microscopic field, eliminating the need for an expensive operative microscope for surgical practice. A convenient and cost-effective simulation protocol could reduce the time frame of the microsurgery learning curve. Furthermore, the use of the smartphone video function may allow improved feedback by mentors, improving access and communication between microsurgical teachers and learners. The PocketSuture smartphone stand is a commercially available device that allows the smartphone camera to be used as magnification. The proposed education protocol included suture practice, vessel dissection, and free tissue transfer in nonliving animal models, with vessel anastomosis and patency confirmation performed with a smartphone camera for field magnification. Video of the suturing technique allowed feedback from the mentor. A progressive suturing protocol leading to the ability to perform microsurgical anastomosis on nonliving animal models was developed. The basic costs for the stand, instrument set and suture were less than $500. The PocketSuture smartphone stand can be used for microsurgical training with real-time video for plastic surgery learners with limited access to microscopes and local mentors.

Identifiers

PMID38435461
PMCPMC10906582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.