Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38435390›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Solar urticaria: clinical characteristics, treatment effectiveness, long-term prognosis, and QOL status in 29 patients.

Shinya Imamura, Yoshiko Oda, Takeshi Fukumoto, Mayuko Mizuno, Mariko Suzuki, Ken Washio, Chikako Nishigori, Atsushi Fukunaga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shinya Imamura *Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Yoshiko Oda *Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Takeshi Fukumoto *Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Mayuko Mizuno *Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Mariko Suzuki *Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Ken Washio *Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Chikako Nishigori *Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Atsushi Fukunaga *Division of Dermatology, Department of Internal Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Kobe University · JPOsaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Solar urticaria (SU), a relatively rare skin inflammatory and photosensitivity disease, is often resistant to standard urticaria treatment. Quality of life (QOL) among SU patients has not been extensively explored. This study was performed to clarify the clinical features and effectiveness of therapies (e.g., hardening therapy) for SU and to determine QOL among SU patients. Methods: The authors examined the characteristics, treatments, and QOL statuses of 29 Japanese SU patients using medical records and a questionnaire approach. Results: Among 29 patients, H1 antihistamine therapy (H1) was effective in 22 (75.8%) patients. H2 antihistamine therapy (H2) was effective in three of seven (42.9%) patients. Ultraviolet radiation A (UVA) hardening therapy was effective in eight of nine (88.9%) patients. Visible light (VL) hardening therapy was ineffective in three of three patients. In one patient who underwent both UVA and VL hardening therapy, only UVA hardening therapy was effective. In the questionnaire, 18 patients (90%) reported some improvement compared with disease onset (four had complete remission, six had completed treatment although mild symptoms persisted, and eight were receiving treatment with moderate symptoms), whereas two patients reported exacerbation. Patients in complete remission had a mean disease duration of 4 years, whereas patients not in remission had a mean disease duration of 8.8 years. The mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score for the current status was 7.4. There was a correlation between DLQI and symptom/treatment status. However, neither DLQI and action spectra nor DLQI and treatments exhibited significant differences. Discussion: The questionnaire revealed current QOL status and long-term prognosis in SU patients. Compared with disease onset, most patients showed improvement when assessed for this study. Both H1 and H2 should be attempted for all SU patients. UVA hardening therapy may be an option for SU patients with an action spectrum that includes UVA.

Indexed as

DLQIIITMUDrush hardening therapysolar urticariaUVAUVBVL

Identifiers

PMID38435390
PMCPMC10904580
OpenAlexW4391880296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.