ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2024
Prognostic impact of the findings of the genetic test in left dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of left dominant arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (LDAC) is sometimes complex. The Padua group recently published a document with criteria to identify patients with LDAC, requiring a compatible genetic variant for diagnosis. Due to the gaps in the knowledge of the role of genetics in its pathogenesis, our objective is to describe the findings of the genetic test in patients with LDAC in our center and its prognostic impact. Methods: Single-center prospective cohort study, in which we recruited 77 patients diagnosed with LDAC or biventricular arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy according to the criteria of Sen-Chowdhry et al. Results: We obtained a positive result in the genetic test in 53.2 %. The desmoplakin gene was the most affected (16.9 %). The mean value of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction was 45.6 ± 13.1 %, with no significant differences in the severity of the dysfunction according to genetics (p = 0.187). Among the patients with positive genetics there was a greater number of segments in the LV affected by fibrosis (p = 0.043). Regarding fatty infiltration in the LV and number of affected segments, there were no significant differences between groups (p = 0.144). MACE was recorded in 23 patients (29.9 %). The positive result in the genetic test was not significantly associated with the occurrence of MACE (p = 0.902). Conclusion: In our study, we did not find mutations responsible for the disease in practically half of the cases. Despite the existence of a high proportion of MACE during follow-up, there were no prognostic differences according to the result of the genetic test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.