Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38435376›Full record

ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2024

Biofouling on titanium implants: a novel formulation of poloxamer and peroxide for

Badra Hussain, Roger Simm, Jaime Bueno, Savvas Giannettou, Ali-Oddin Naemi, Ståle Petter Lyngstadaas, Håvard Jostein Haugen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Badra HussainDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Roger SimmInstitute of Oral Biology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Jaime BuenoDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Savvas GiannettouDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ali-Oddin NaemiInstitute of Oral Biology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ståle Petter LyngstadaasDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Håvard Jostein HaugenDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6690-7233
University of Oslo · NOUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eradicating biofouling from implant surfaces is essential in treating peri-implant infections, as it directly addresses the microbial source for infection and inflammation around dental implants. This controlled laboratory study examines the effectiveness of the four commercially available debridement solutions '(EDTA (Prefgel

Indexed as

chemical decontaminationcleaning of implant surfacescomplex oral biofilmspellicle formationperi-implantitis

Identifiers

PMID38435376
PMCPMC10907064
OpenAlexW4391758935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.