Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38435295›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Assessing the clinical benefit, safety, and patient-reported outcomes with the use of the PAHcare™ digital platform in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a pilot study.

Gregorio Pérez Peñate, Nuria Ochoa Parra, Juan Antonio Domingo Morera, Amaya Martínez Meñaca, Marta López Ramón, Sergio Cadenas Menéndez, Fernando León Marrero, Sara Gómara de la Cal, Cristina Ghadban-Garrido, Patricia Royo Tolosana and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Gregorio Pérez PeñateUnidad Multidisciplinar Vascular Pulmonar, Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Nuria Ochoa ParraUnidad Multidisciplinar de Hipertensión Pulmonar, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Antonio Domingo MoreraServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
Amaya Martínez MeñacaServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain.
Marta López RamónServicios de Neumología y Cardiología, Unidad de Hipertensión Pulmonar, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Sergio Cadenas MenéndezClinical Research Department, Ferrer, Barcelona, Spain.
Fernando León MarreroUnidad Multidisciplinar Vascular Pulmonar, Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Sara Gómara de la CalServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
Cristina Ghadban-GarridoServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain.
Patricia Royo TolosanaServicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
Javier Martín PuentesServicios de Neumología y Cardiología, Unidad de Hipertensión Pulmonar, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Rebeca Aldonza AguayoClinical Research Department, Ferrer, Barcelona, Spain.
Hadis MahdaviDigital Health & Technology, Ferrer, Barcelona, Spain.
Gabriela Bacchini JeanneretCorporate Medical Department, Ferrer, Barcelona, Spain.
Pilar Escribano SubíasUnidad Multidisciplinar de Hipertensión Pulmonar, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Ferrer Grupo (Spain) · ESHospital Universitario Miguel Servet · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Salamanca · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Digital health interventions, particularly mobile health platforms, have shown promise in supporting patients with respiratory conditions, but their application in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remains limited. We aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and potential clinical benefit of the novel PAHcare™ digital platform as a patient-centred intervention for PAH management through a prospective, single-arm, multicenter pilot study conducted on 53 patients diagnosed with PAH who used the platform for 6 months. Methods: The primary objective was to assess the impact on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) through questionnaires. Secondary objectives included evaluating clinical outcomes, including disease progression, PAH signs and symptoms, the 6-min walking test, and the patient's symptom perception. Additionally, we assessed patient satisfaction and engagement with the PAHcare™ platform, interaction with health coaches, retention, costs and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU), and safety through monitoring device incidents. Results: Minimal changes in HRQoL and clinical outcomes were observed over 6 months. A noteworthy 92.4% of patients actively used the platform in the first month, maintaining high usage throughout the study. Patient satisfaction was substantial, with more than half of the patients expressing excellence in service quality, willingness to reuse the platform, and fulfilment of their needs. Health coach interaction was high, with 76% of patients initiating contact within the first week. User retention rates were 70%, with prevalent ongoing usage and interaction with healthcare professionals even after the study. In terms of HCRU and costs, the study showed no significant changes in PAH-related hospital admissions, clinical visits, or tests. Finally, the low number of device-related incidents indicated platform safety. Conclusion: This pilot study provides compelling evidence supporting the feasibility and acceptability of the PAHcare™ digital platform to empower patients to manage their disease and significantly enhance their overall experience with PAH.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Arterial HypertensionHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesQuality of Lifedigital intervention platformelectronic patient-reported outcomehealth services researchmobile health (mHealth)patient support programpulmonary arterial hypertension

Identifiers

PMID38435295
PMCPMC10904626
OpenAlexW4391880244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.