Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38435079›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2024

Case report and literature review: Orally ingested toothpick perforating the lower rectum.

Xingliang Zhang, Mei Xing, Shaoyang Lei, Wentao Li, Zijin Li, Yibing Xie, Chenyu Zhu, Shuqian Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Xingliang Zhang *Department of Graduate School, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Mei Xing *Department of Radiology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Shaoyang LeiDepartment of Radiology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Wentao LiDepartment of Radiology, First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Zijin LiDepartment of Radiology, Yuebei People's Hospital, Shaoguan, Guangdong, China.
Yibing XieDepartment of Graduate School, Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, Hebei, China.
Chenyu ZhuDepartment of Graduate School, North China University of Science and Technology, Hebei, China.
Shuqian ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Hebei General Hospital · CNFirst Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNHebei Medical University · CNHebei North University · CNNorth China University of Technology · CNShantou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Most foreign bodies (FBs) can spontaneously pass through the gastrointestinal tract. Sharp FBs are believed to be able to puncture any part of the gastrointestinal tract, causing perforation and potentially secondary damage to adjacent organs. Case description: A 44-year-old man complained of having persistent dull pain in the perianal region. He was diagnosed with a toothpick impacted into the wall of the lower rectum after accepting a digital rectal examination of the lower rectum and a pelvic computed tomography (CT). The surgeon extracted the FB using vascular forceps guided by the operator's index finger. The patient was discharged after intravenous ceftriaxone was given for 6 days. A follow-up pelvic CT performed 2 weeks after surgery revealed that the perirectal fat and muscles had already normalized. Conclusion: A systematic review of relevant literature from the past decade was performed to summarize the imaging features of an orally ingested toothpick perforating the gastrointestinal tract. The location of abdominal pain is an important clue for the diagnosis of toothpick perforation, and a CT examination is recommended as the first option for the detection of an ingested toothpick. Determining the location of the toothpick perforation and assessing the severity of local inflammation are important bases for the selection of treatment.

Indexed as

computed tomographyforeign bodiesgastrointestinal perforationrectum perforationtoothpick

Identifiers

PMID38435079
PMCPMC10904550
OpenAlexW4391880114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.