Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38435017›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Patterns in bird and pollinator occupancy and richness in a mosaic of urban office parks across scales and seasons.

Kelly J Iknayan, Sacha K Heath, Scott B Terrill, Daniel G Wenny, Stephanie Panlasigui, Yiwei Wang, Erin E Beller, Erica N Spotswood

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kelly J IknayanSan Francisco Estuary Institute Richmond California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3327-2235
Sacha K HeathSan Francisco Estuary Institute Richmond California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9822-8091
Scott B TerrillH. T. Harvey & Associates Los Gatos California USA.
Daniel G WennySan Francisco Bay Bird Observatory Milpitas California USA.
Stephanie PanlasiguiSan Francisco Estuary Institute Richmond California USA.
Yiwei WangSan Francisco Bay Bird Observatory Milpitas California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4875-0703
Erin E BellerReal Estate and Workplace Services Sustainability Team, Google Inc. Mountain View California USA.
Erica N SpotswoodSan Francisco Estuary Institute Richmond California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7787-7180
San Francisco Estuary Institute · USPoint Blue Conservation Science · USGoogle (United States) · USH.T. Harvey & Associates · USThe Nature Conservancy · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urbanization is a leading cause of global biodiversity loss, yet cities can provide resources required by many species throughout the year. In recognition of this, cities around the world are adopting strategies to increase biodiversity. These efforts would benefit from a robust understanding of how natural and enhanced features in urbanized areas influence various taxa. We explored seasonal and spatial patterns in occupancy and taxonomic richness of birds and pollinators among office parks in Santa Clara County, California, USA, where natural features and commercial landscaping have generated variation in conditions across scales. We surveyed birds and insect pollinators, estimated multi-species occupancy and species richness, and found that spatial scale (local, neighborhood, and landscape scale), season, and urban sensitivity were all important for understanding how communities occupied sites. Features at the landscape (distance to streams or baylands) and local scale (tree canopy, shrub, or impervious cover) were the strongest predictors of avian occupancy in all seasons. Pollinator richness was influenced by local tree canopy and impervious cover in spring, and distance to baylands in early and late summer. We then predicted the relative contributions of different spatial scales to annual bird species richness by simulating "good" and "poor" quality sites based on influential covariates returned by the previous models. Shifting from poor to good quality conditions locally increased annual avian richness by up to 6.8 species with no predicted effect on the quality of the neighborhood. Conversely, sites of poor local and neighborhood scale quality in good-quality landscapes were predicted to harbor 11.5 more species than sites of good local- and neighborhood-scale quality in poor-quality landscapes. Finally, more urban-sensitive bird species were gained at good quality sites relative to urban tolerant species, suggesting that urban natural features at the local and landscape scales disproportionately benefited them.

Indexed as

citieslandscapelocalmulti‐species occupancyneighborhoodspecies richness

Identifiers

PMID38435017
PMCPMC10905236
OpenAlexW4392354521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.