Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38434931›Full record

ArticleGigaByte (Hong Kong, China)2024

BatchEval Pipeline: batch effect evaluation workflow for multiple datasets joint analysis.

Chao Zhang, Qiang Kang, Mei Li, Hongqing Xie, Shuangsang Fang, Xun Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaByte (Hong Kong, China), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chao ZhangBGI Research, Shenzhen, 518103, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5162-9568
Qiang KangBGI Research, Shenzhen, 518103, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6579-7944
Mei LiBGI Research, Shenzhen, 518103, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3310-2911
Hongqing XieBGI Research, Shenzhen, 518103, China.
Shuangsang FangBGI Research, Shenzhen, 518103, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4126-0074
Xun XuBGI Research, Wuhan, 430074, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5338-5173

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As genomic sequencing technology continues to advance, it becomes increasingly important to perform joint analyses of multiple datasets of transcriptomics. However, batch effect presents challenges for dataset integration, such as sequencing data measured on different platforms, and datasets collected at different times. Here, we report the development of BatchEval Pipeline, a batch effect workflow used to evaluate batch effect on dataset integration. The BatchEval Pipeline generates a comprehensive report, which consists of a series of HTML pages for assessment findings, including a main page, a raw dataset evaluation page, and several built-in methods evaluation pages. The main page exhibits basic information of the integrated datasets, a comprehensive score of batch effect, and the most recommended method for removing batch effect from the current datasets. The remaining pages exhibit evaluation details for the raw dataset, and evaluation results from the built-in batch effect removal methods after removing batch effect. This comprehensive report enables researchers to accurately identify and remove batch effects, resulting in more reliable and meaningful biological insights from integrated datasets. In summary, the BatchEval Pipeline represents a significant advancement in batch effect evaluation, and is a valuable tool to improve the accuracy and reliability of the experimental results. Availability & Implementation: The source code of the BatchEval Pipeline is available at https://github.com/STOmics/BatchEval.

Identifiers

PMID38434931
PMCPMC10905258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.