ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis
Clinical Analysis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-institution Experience.
Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral cancer driver gene mutations in oral potentially malignant disorders: clinical significance and diagnostic implications.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- GINS2 promotes oral squamous cell carcinoma progression and immune evasion by recruiting PD-L1Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Salivary Biomarkers and Their Link to Oncogenic Signaling Pathways in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Diagnostic and Translational Perspectives in a Narrative Review.Oncology research · 2025Review
- A novel nomogram for predicting overall survival in patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma using clinical features and MRI radiomics data: a pilot study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- N-myristoyltransferase 1-mediated Src Myristoylation Promotes Non-receptor Tyrosine Kinase Pathways in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Physalin A Suppresses Human Oral Squamous Carcinoma Cell Migration and Invasion Through Inhibiting Grb2/Ras and MMP/uPA Signaling Pathways.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aim: There is limited evidence about the significance of head and neck surgical observation at the time of diagnosis and follow-up of oral cancer after treatment. The aim of this study was to elucidate the prognosis and prognostic factors of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), analyze cases of double cancers, and highlight the importance of examinations during both diagnosis and post-treatment for OSCC. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 272 OSCC cases treated for the first time during a 10-year period from April 2013 to March 2023 at Kyushu University Hospital. Information obtained in the clinical setting, such as age, stage, prognosis, and presence of double cancers, was used in the analysis. Results: The mean age of 272 patients was 69 years; 203 patients were males and 69 were females. The most common oral cancer sites were the tongue (54.4%). The 5-year overall survival rate was 63.8%. Double cancer was found in 93 patients (34.2%). Synchronous double cancers were found in 38 patients (14.0%), 50% of whose cancer types were head and neck cancers. Conclusion: We analyzed 272 OSCC patients treated at the Kyushu University Hospital, and the results were comparable to those reported by other institutions. Tumor site, age, and stage were identified as prognostic factors. Half of the patients with synchronous double cancers had head and neck cancer, and 3-10% of patients with double cancers after treatment for OSCC also had head and neck cancer, suggesting the importance of otorhinolaryngological observation at the time of the diagnosis and after treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.