ArticleACS omega2024
Generalizability Improvement of Interpretable Symbolic Regression Models for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and ultra-high performance computing methods and experiments for drug discovery: virtual screening, deep learning, molecular dynamics simulations, ADMET modelling, and experimental validation.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Explainable and interpretable models for predicting early-onset hypertension in the Tlalpan 2020 cohort.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Overcoming the Black Box Challenge: Building Trust in Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Oncology.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the pursuit of optimal quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models, two key factors are paramount: the robustness of predictive ability and the interpretability of the model. Symbolic regression (SR) searches for the mathematical expressions that explain a training data set. Thus, the models provided by SR are globally interpretable. We previously proposed an SR method that can generate interpretable expressions by humans. This study introduces an enhanced symbolic regression method, termed filter-induced genetic programming 2 (FIGP2), as an extension of our previously proposed SR method. FIGP2 is designed to improve the generalizability of SR models and to be applicable to data sets in which cost-intensive descriptors are employed. The FIGP2 method incorporates two major improvements: a modified domain filter to eradicate diverging expressions based on optimal calculation and the introduction of a stability metric to penalize expressions that would lead to overfitting. Our retrospective comparative analysis using 12 structure-activity relationship data sets revealed that FIGP2 surpassed the previously proposed SR method and conventional modeling methods, such as support vector regression and multivariate linear regression in terms of predictive performance. Generated mathematical expressions by FIGP2 were relatively simple and not divergent in the domain of function. Taken together, FIGP2 can be used for making interpretable regression models with predictive ability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.