Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38434807›Full record

ReviewACS omega2024

Recent Trends and Advances in Additive-Mediated Composting Technology for Agricultural Waste Resources: A Comprehensive Review.

Rana Shahzad Noor, Adnan Noor Shah, Muhammad Bilal Tahir, Muhammad Umair, Muhammad Nawaz, Amjed Ali, Sezai Ercisli, Nader R Abdelsalam, Hayssam M Ali, Seung Hwan Yang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Valorizing Bio-Waste and Residuals.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Rana Shahzad NoorDepartment of Agriculture, Biological, Environment and Energy Engineering, College of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China.
Adnan Noor ShahDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3722-8848
Muhammad Bilal TahirInstitute of Physics, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0495-0236
Muhammad UmairFaculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan.
Muhammad NawazDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Punjab, Pakistan.
Amjed AliFaculty of Agriculture, Department of Agronomy, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Punjab, Pakistan.
Sezai ErcisliDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ataturk University, 25240 Erzurum, Turkiye.
Nader R AbdelsalamAgricultural Botany Department, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21531, Egypt.
Hayssam M AliDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6801-4263
Seung Hwan YangDepartment of Biotechnology, Chonnam National University, Yeosu 59626, South Korea.
Sami UllahDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9669-5737
Mohammed Ali AssiriDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.
Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology · PKKing Khalid University · SAAlexandria University · EGAtatürk University · TRChonnam National University · KRKing Saud University · SANortheast Agricultural University · CNPir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University · PKUniversity of Sargodha · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agriculture waste has increased annually due to the global food demand and intensive animal production. Preventing environmental degradation requires fast and effective agricultural waste treatment. Aerobic digestion or composting uses agricultural wastes to create a stabilized and sterilized organic fertilizer and reduces chemical fertilizer input. Indeed, conventional composting technology requires a large surface area, a long fermentation period, significant malodorous emissions, inferior product quality, and little demand for poor end results. Conventional composting loses a lot of organic nitrogen and carbon. Thus, this comprehensive research examined sustainable and adaptable methods for improving agricultural waste composting efficiency. This review summarizes composting processes and examines how compost additives affect organic solid waste composting and product quality. Our findings indicate that additives have an impact on the composting process by influencing variables including temperature, pH, and moisture. Compost additive amendment could dramatically reduce gas emissions and mineral ion mobility. Composting additives can (1) improve the physicochemical composition of the compost mixture, (2) accelerate organic material disintegration and increase microbial activity, (3) reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) and ammonia (NH

Identifiers

PMID38434807
PMCPMC10905604
OpenAlexW4391909662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.