Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38434774›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental chemistry letters2024

Hari Ram Upadhayay, Adrian Joynes, Adrian L Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental chemistry letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hari Ram UpadhayayNet Zero and Resilient Farming, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, EX20 2SB UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4851-4268
Adrian JoynesNet Zero and Resilient Farming, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, EX20 2SB UK.
Adrian L CollinsNet Zero and Resilient Farming, Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, EX20 2SB UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rainfall and land-use interactions drive temporal shifts in suspended sediment sources, yet the magnitude of such changes remains poorly understood due to the lack of land-use specific source tracers. We investigated α,ω-dicarboxylic fatty acid root-specific biomarkers, as diagnostic tracers for apportioning sources of time-integrated suspended sediment samples collected from a grassland dominated agricultural catchment in the southwest of England during the wet winter period. Applying fatty acids-specific stable carbon isotope analysis and a Bayesian isotope mixing model, we show that stream banks contributed most of the sediment in the early winter, i.e. October-December, while winter cereal-dominated arable land contributed more than half of the sediment during the late winter, i.e. January-March. The dominant sediment source shifted in conjunction with a period of prolonged consecutive rainfall days in the later period suggesting that intervention required to mitigate soil erosion and sediment delivery should adapt to changing rainfall patterns. Our novel findings demonstrate that isotopic signatures of α,ω-dicarboxylic fatty acids are promising tracers for understanding the resistance of agricultural soils to water erosion and quantifying the interactive effects of extreme rainfall and land use on catchment sediment source dynamics. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10311-023-01684-1.

Indexed as

Bayesian unmixing modelLand useSediment fingerprintingSuberin

Identifiers

PMID38434774
PMCPMC10907443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.