Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38434654›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2023

Development of an

Alice Scemama, Sophia Lunetto, Artysha Tailor, Stefania Di Cio, Matthew Dibble, Julien Gautrot, Adrian Biddle

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alice ScemamaBlizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AT, UK.
Sophia LunettoQueen Mary University of London, London, England, UK.
Artysha TailorBlizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AT, UK.
Stefania Di CioSchool of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Matthew DibbleSchool of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Julien GautrotSchool of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Adrian BiddleBlizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 2AT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4371-9720
Queen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V009494/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastasis occurs when cancer cells leave the primary tumour and travel to a secondary site to form a new lesion. The tumour microenvironment (TME) is recognised to greatly influence this process, with for instance the vascular system enabling the dissemination of the cells into other tissues. However, understanding the exact role of these microenvironmental cells during metastasis has proven challenging. Indeed,

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellMouth NeoplasmsAnimalsCoculture TechniquesEndothelial CellsHumansMicrofluidicsTumor MicroenvironmentcancerchipHUVECmetastasismicroenvironmentmicrofluidicvasculature

Identifiers

PMID38434654
PMCPMC10904955
OpenAlexW4390885833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.