Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38434610›Full record

Trial reportOpen forum infectious diseases2024

Early Versus Late Antipseudomonal β-Lactam Antibiotic Dose Adjustment in Critically Ill Sepsis Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

Namareq F Aldardeer, Maram M Alshreef, Emad A Alharbi, Ahmad K Aljabri, Mohammad H Aljawadi, Thamer A Almangour, Saad Alobaili, Mohammed I Alarifi, Awad Alomari, Abdullah M Alhammad

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Challenges and opportunities in the management of severe pneumonia. Key concepts from the Seventh Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2025.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Prescribing for change - safer antimicrobial use in hospitals.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  8. The importance of antibiotic treatment duration in antimicrobial resistance.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Namareq F AldardeerDepartment of Pharmacy Services, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Maram M AlshreefDepartment of Pharmacy Services, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Emad A AlharbiDepartment of Pharmacy Services, King Fahad Hospital, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad K AljabriDepartment of Pharmacy Services, King Fahad Hospital, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad H AljawadiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Thamer A AlmangourDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saad AlobailiDepartment of Medicine, Nephrology Unit, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed I AlarifiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Awad AlomariCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah M AlhammadDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9806-2503
King Saud University · SAKing Fahad Hospital Jeddah · SAAlfaisal University · SAKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAKing Saud Medical City · SARiyadh Armed Forces Hospital · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of sepsis, contributing to an increased mortality rate. However, some studies have demonstrated that renal function improves in sepsis patients with AKI within 48 hours, raising questions about the necessity for early antibiotic adjustment. This study evaluates the association between the timing of antipseudomonal β-lactam dose adjustment and the outcomes of critically ill sepsis patients with AKI. Methods: A prospective, multicenter observational study of critically ill patients aged ≥18 years admitted to the intensive care unit with sepsis and AKI and started on antipseudomonal β-lactam therapy. After the initial dose, eligible patients were grouped as early β-lactam antibiotic (E-BLA) or late β-lactam antibiotic (L-BLA) dose adjustments based on the administration of subsequent renally adjusted doses within 24 hours and after 24 hours of sepsis recognition, respectively. The main outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. Results: Among 1185 patients screened, 224 (mean age, 62.7 ± 16.8 years; 62% were male) met inclusion criteria. Eighty-four and 140 patients were included in the E-BLA and L-BLA groups, respectively. Approximately half of the cohort presented with AKI stage II, and piperacillin-tazobactam was prescribed as initial empirical therapy in more than 50% of the cohort. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, L-BLA was associated with a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality compared to E-BLA (hazard ratio, 0.588 [95% confidence interval, .355-.974]). Conclusions: In sepsis patients with AKI, L-BLA was associated with in-hospital mortality benefits.

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryintensive care unitsepsisseptic shockβ-lactams

Identifiers

PMID38434610
PMCPMC10906704
OpenAlexW4391452119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.