ArticleJournal of inflammation research2024
Prognostic Value of Fibrinogen to Prealbumin Ratio (FPR) in Resectable Gastric Cancer.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A nomogram based on systemic inflammatory markers: development and validation for predicting postoperative overall survival in gastric cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Preoperative Fibrinogen-to-Prealbumin Ratio and in-Hospital Postoperative Pneumonia After Minimally Invasive McKeown Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Infection Phenotype Profiling.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Application and progress of nomograms in gastric cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Fibrinogen to pre-albumin ratio is an independent prognostic index for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after radical resection.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The ratio of fibrinogen to prealbumin (FPR) is associated with the prognosis of many cancers. However, the prognostic significance of FPR in resectable gastric cancer has not been clarified. Methods: A total of 760 patients with resectable gastric cancer participated in this study. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to calculate the optimal cutoff value of each immunonutrition marker. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to confirm the prognostic value of FPR in patients with gastric cancer and to select appropriate variables for the construction of nomogram. Results: Utilizing ROC analysis, we calculated the optimal cutoff value for FPR and stratified 760 patients into high and low FPR groups. Subsequent examination revealed notable distinctions in baseline characteristics between these groups. For instance, Patients with higher FPR tend to be older and have more lymph node metastasis. Statistical analysis through the chi-square test confirmed the significance of these differences (P < 0.05). In addition, the results of the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicate that the factors related to OS were age (P = 0.001), T stage (P < 0.001), N stage (P < 0.001), radical resection (P < 0.001), and FPR (P < 0.024). The nomogram is composed of the above five variables. ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram was 0.859 (95% CI: 0.831-0.887), and the sensitivity and specificity were 77.4% and 82.1%, respectively. Conclusion: FPR is a potential marker in patients with resectable gastric cancer. The nomogram based on FPR shows good predictive ability, which is helpful for clinicians to judge the prognosis of patients and choose targeted treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.