ArticleVeterinary and animal science2024
Evaluation of close up antimicrobial therapies for treatment and prevention of subclinical mastitis in the herds with high prevalence of
Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trace Element Changes in Goat Milk Following Experimentally Induced Intramammary Infection With Biofilm Positive and Negative Strains of Staphylococcus aureus.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a new method of selective dry cow treatment using microbiological culture and antibiogram results.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This field trial was conducted to evaluate two antibiotics at a close-up period in curing the existing IMI and to prevent new clinical and subclinical Intramammary infection (IMI). Two hundred and twelve Holstein cows were assigned to one of three treatment groups: TYLO, MARB and CONT. Cows in TYLO group received 10 mg/kg Tylosin for three days at the close-up period (21 days before calving), cows in MARB group received single SC injection of 8 mg/kg SC marbofloxacin at the close-up period and cows in CONT group remained untreated. Milk samples were collected for somatic cell count, microbial culture and Total oxidant/antioxidant capacity before drying-off, and 3 and 7days post calving. Antimicrobial susceptibility test and RAPT-PCR were performed on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.