Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38434494›Full record

Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2024

Polymeric Microfluidic Fuel Cells with Controlled Printed Patterns.

Vikash Kumar, Malaya Prasad Behera, Sarat Singamneni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vikash KumarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Additive Manufacturing Research Center, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Malaya Prasad BeheraDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Additive Manufacturing Research Center, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2683-8739
Sarat SingamneniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Additive Manufacturing Research Center, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6595-3406

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its first appearance almost a couple of decades ago, microfluidic fuel cells (MFFCs) have gained considerable research momentum due to their potential applications in portable devices. The main focus has been on the effective fabrication of microfluidic channels with different materials, where the manufacturing limitations proved to be the main stumbling blocks. Paper-based MFFCs have been reported with some success, where the porosity of the flow channel medium drives the reactants, greatly reducing the need for elaborate external devices and complex manufacturing obstacles, although the longevity of these cells remains questionable. The current article addresses this issue by replacing the paper-based flow channels with 3D-printed substrates of different structural forms to serve as pathways for controlled flow and mixing responses of the reactant liquids without the use of other devices, such as micro pumps and valves. The line-by-line material consolidation mechanics of fused filament fabrication and the porous mesostructural responses of a commercial polymer filament are combined to build the microfluidic fuel channels of varying configurations. Numerical and experimental characterizations proved the cells to perform better than the current paper-based counterparts, apart from better longevity and possible new opportunities for future improvements based on more complex micro-, meso-, and macrostructural advances.

Indexed as

3D printingcapillary riseexperimental characterizationfuel cellsmicrofluidicmultiphase fluid flownumerical modeling

Identifiers

PMID38434494
PMCPMC10908328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.