ReviewHeliyon2024
Alkali activated materials applied in 3D printing construction: A review.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Influence of Environmental Exposures on the Mechanical Performance and Durability of 3D-Printed Cementitious and Alkali-Activated Composites.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to contribute to the promising field of alkali-activated materials (AAM) used in 3D printing for construction. Presented as a comprehensive review, the research provides valuable insights for researchers within and beyond the field. The study focuses on identifying prevalent research trends and accessing pertinent information on materials, methodologies, and parameters of interest. The study commenced with a bibliometric analysis of 55 carefully selected publications, followed by an in-depth review of these articles categorized into extrusion-based and powder-based systems. Emphasis was placed on the materials used, methodologies employed, and key findings from these studies. The bibliometric analysis unveiled prevalent keywords, their relevance in the field, highly cited articles, and collaborative networks among researchers. The most influential countries in terms of publications are Australia, China, and Singapore. The review highlighted commonly used materials and their potential impacts on large-scale applications of AAM, exploring how various precursors, activators, additives, aggregates, and reinforcements shape the properties of printed AAM, featuring innovative approaches with alternative materials. The methodologies employed in these studies and trends in characterization were outlined, due to the absence of standardized tests for materials in 3D printing applications. The study emphasized how material properties vary concerning production processes, printing parameters, curing methods, and post-treatment, outlining advancements in material characterization necessary for achieving a printable mix design. Through the analysis of these 55 articles, key scientific challenges and hurdles in large-scale applications were identified, suggesting potential focal points for further studies. In summary, AAMs exhibit substantial uniqueness and complexity due to their diverse material composition, resulting in varying properties in both fresh and hardened states. However, this diversity also signifies the adaptability of AAMs to diverse equipment, construction techniques, and desired specifications, showcasing their potential to revolutionize traditional construction by integrating technology and sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.