ArticleHeliyon2024
Genotype by environment interaction, AMMI, GGE biplot, and mega environment analysis of elite
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the spatial adaptation for iron and zinc content using AMMI and GGE biplot model in lentil (Lens culinaris L.).BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Multi-Environment Evaluation and Stability Analysis for the Selection of Elite Pearl Millet Genotypes with Better Fodder Yield and Quality Component Traits.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Analyzing genotype-environment interactions and identifying stable and high-yielding sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench) genotypes using different stability models.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Yield performance and stability of durum wheat varieties in northwestern Ethiopia.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Delineating genotype × environment interaction for horticultural traits in tomato using GGE and AMMI biplot analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analysis of yield stability and genotype-environment interaction for open-pollinated tomato varieties in the Kashmir Himalaya using the AMMI model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mungbean G × E interaction unveiling resistance to Cercospora leaf spot through GGE biplot analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Intraspecific variation for heat stress tolerance in wild emmer-derived durum wheat populations.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Identifying Adaptable Varieties of Sorghum (F1000Research · 2025Article
- Stay-green trait improves yield, quality, and feeding value of forage oats under contrasting eco-sowing systems.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Genotype-environment interaction for grain yield in maize (Zea mays L.) using the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model.Journal of applied genetics · 2024Article
- Cultivating sustainable futures: multi-environment evaluation and seed yield stability of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes by using different stability parameters in Ethiopia.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Genotype-by-environment interaction and stability analysis of grain yield of bread wheat (Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate high-yielding, stable sorghum genotypes and determine the ideal (representative and discriminating) testing environments for genotypes in the humid lowlands of Ethiopia. A total of forty-two sorghum genotypes were used for a field trial conducted in six different environments using a randomized complete block design. Yield stability, Additive main effect, multiplicative interaction (AMMI), and genotype and genotype by environment interaction (GGE) were computed. The AMMI analysis explained 62.85% of the G×E variance. The AMMI1 biplot revealed that (G4; Mok079 and (G16; Ba066) genotypes had higher grain yields. AMMI2 biplot suggested that genotypes (G18; Y0470),(G23;100620), (G29; PML981475), and (G11; ETSC300373-4) show higher sensitivity to environmental changes because of their strong genotype-by-environment interactions. The GGE captured 79.46% of the GGE variance, and the GGE biplot identified genotypes (G4; Mok079), (G10; Sl081) and (G16; Ba066) were the most stable genotypes whereas(G39; ETSC120051-3) was the least stable genotypes. The GGE biplot identified Assosa (AS20) as a suitable environment, whereas PW20 and JM20 were the most discriminating and non-representative environments. The GGE biplot was found to identify three main mega-environments for sorghum growing in the humid lowlands of Ethiopia., both the AMMI and GGE biplots revealed (G4; Mok079) had the highest level of adaptability to all tested environments and was approved by the National Variety Release Committee for release in 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.