Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38434414›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Genotype by environment interaction, AMMI, GGE biplot, and mega environment analysis of elite

Habtamu Demelash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Habtamu DemelashEthiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Assosa Agricultural Research Center, Assosa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate high-yielding, stable sorghum genotypes and determine the ideal (representative and discriminating) testing environments for genotypes in the humid lowlands of Ethiopia. A total of forty-two sorghum genotypes were used for a field trial conducted in six different environments using a randomized complete block design. Yield stability, Additive main effect, multiplicative interaction (AMMI), and genotype and genotype by environment interaction (GGE) were computed. The AMMI analysis explained 62.85% of the G×E variance. The AMMI1 biplot revealed that (G4; Mok079 and (G16; Ba066) genotypes had higher grain yields. AMMI2 biplot suggested that genotypes (G18; Y0470),(G23;100620), (G29; PML981475), and (G11; ETSC300373-4) show higher sensitivity to environmental changes because of their strong genotype-by-environment interactions. The GGE captured 79.46% of the GGE variance, and the GGE biplot identified genotypes (G4; Mok079), (G10; Sl081) and (G16; Ba066) were the most stable genotypes whereas(G39; ETSC120051-3) was the least stable genotypes. The GGE biplot identified Assosa (AS20) as a suitable environment, whereas PW20 and JM20 were the most discriminating and non-representative environments. The GGE biplot was found to identify three main mega-environments for sorghum growing in the humid lowlands of Ethiopia., both the AMMI and GGE biplots revealed (G4; Mok079) had the highest level of adaptability to all tested environments and was approved by the National Variety Release Committee for release in 2022.

Indexed as

AMMI modelGGE biplotHumid lowlandSorghum bicolorStability analysis

Identifiers

PMID38434414
PMCPMC10907745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.