Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38434390›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Design of battery shell stamping parameters for vehicles based on fusion of various artificial neural network models.

Na Liu, Yuanyuan Gao, Peng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Na LiuSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, 250101, China.
Yuanyuan GaoSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, 250101, China.
Peng LiuSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, 250101, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of neural network model in engineering prediction is frequent. The BPE shell material was optimized, and the reliability of the new material was verified by modal simulation. The accuracy of finite element modeling was ensured by constrained mode experiments, and all variables were preprocessed by Latin hypercube sampling. The design parameters were determined by Monte Carlo simulation. Four different neural networks, including back propagation (BP), radial basis function (RBF), extreme learning machine (ELM) and wavelet neural network (WNN), are used to train and learn the dataset. The BPE weight reduction ratio was 14.3%, the stress was reduced by 18.6%, deformation displacement was reduced by 14.2%, and the first-order mode was increased by 29.1%.

Indexed as

Finite element analysisNeural network modelStructural optimization

Identifiers

PMID38434390
PMCPMC10906323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.