ArticleHeliyon2024
Transcranial brain parenchyma sonographic findings in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 and 2.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcranial Brain Parenchyma Sonographic Findings in Familial and Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Myotonic dystrophies: an update on clinical features, molecular mechanisms, management, and gene therapy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2) are genetically determined progressive muscular disorders with multisystemic affection, including brain involvement. Transcranial sonography (TCS) is a reliable diagnostic tool for the investigation of deep brain structures. We sought to evaluate TCS findings in genetically confirmed DM1 and DM2 patients, and further correlate these results with patients' clinical features. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 163 patients (102 DM1, 61 DM2). Echogenicity of the brainstem raphe (BR) and substantia nigra (SN) as well as the diameter of the third ventricle (DTV) were assessed by TCS. Patients were evaluated using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale and Daytime Sleepiness Scale. Results: SN hyperechogenicity was observed in 40% of DM1 and 34% of DM2 patients. SN hypoechogenicity was detected in 17% of DM1 and 7% of DM2 patients. BR hypoechogenicity was found in 36% of DM1 and 47% of DM2 subjects. Enlarged DTV was noted in 19% of DM1 and 15% of DM2 patients. Older, weaker, depressive, and fatigued DM1 patients were more likely to have BR hypoechogenicity (p < 0.05). DTV correlated with age and disease duration in DM1 (p < 0.01). In DM2 patients SN hyperechogenicity correlated with fatigue. Excessive daytime sleepiness was associated with hypoechogenic BR (p < 0.05) and enlarged DVT (p < 0.01) in DM2 patients. Conclusions: TCS is an easy applicable and sensitive neuroimaging technique that could offer new information regarding several brainstem structures in DM1 and DM2. This may lead to better understanding of the pathogenesis of the brain involvement in DM with possible clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.