ArticleHeliyon2024
HeLa cell segmentation using digital image processing.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computational cell segmentation is a vital area of research, particularly in the analysis of images of cancer cells. The use of cell lines, such as the widely utilized HeLa cell line, is crucial for studying cancer. While deep learning algorithms have been commonly employed for cell segmentation, their resource and data requirements can be impractical for many laboratories. In contrast, image processing algorithms provide a promising alternative due to their effectiveness and minimal resource demands. This article presents the development of an algorithm utilizing digital image processing to segment the nucleus and shape of HeLa cells. The research aims to segment the cell shape in the image center and accurately identify the nucleus. The study uses and processes 300 images obtained from Serial Block-Face Scanning Electron Microscopy (SBF-SEM). For cell segmentation, the morphological operation of erosion was used to separate the cells, and through distance calculation, the cell located at the center of the image was selected. Subsequently, the eroded shape was employed to restore the original cell shape. The nucleus segmentation uses parameters such as distances and sizes, along with the implementation of verification stages to ensure accurate detection. The accuracy of the algorithm is demonstrated by comparing it with another algorithm meeting the same conditions, using four segmentation similarity metrics. The evaluation results rank the proposed algorithm as the superior choice, highlighting significant outcomes. The algorithm developed represents a crucial initial step towards more accurate disease analysis. In addition, it enables the measurement of shapes and the identification of morphological alterations, damages, and changes in organelles within the cell, which can be vital for diagnostic purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.