Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38434235›Full record

ArticleIJID regions2024

Validating a questionnaire to identify women in the first trimester of pregnancy during preventive chemotherapy interventions against soil-transmitted helminths in northwestern Tanzania.

Humphrey D Mazigo, Antonio Montresor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IJID regions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Humphrey D MazigoDepartment of Medical Parasitology, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza, Tanzania.
Antonio MontresorFondazione Decarneri, Viale Monza 44, 2027, Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the performance of a questionnaire in assessing the pregnancy status of women of reproductive age during preventive chemotherapy interventions. Methods: A questionnaire (20 questions) was administered to 1217 women of reproductive age (≥18 years) from Ilemela and Buchosa districts, northwestern Tanzania. A single urine sample was collected from each of them and tested using a rapid pregnancy test for presence of pregnant. Results: Overall, 10.8% (132/1217) of the women reported to be pregnant at the specific question in the questionnaire. The rapid pregnancy test identified 15.1% (184/1217) of the women to be pregnant. In total, 86.4% (114/132) of the women who reported to be pregnant during the interview were confirmed to be pregnant using the rapid pregnant test. The question on pregnancy demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 98.3%. Conclusions: The questionnaire performance was not completely satisfactory; however, it managed to identify pregnant women in the first trimester. The question on the last date of the start of the menstrual period yield the highest sensitivity and appeared to be the key one used in combination with other questions. Further validation of these results in other countries with different cultures are recommended to fully evaluate the performance of this method.

Indexed as

Pregnancy statusPreventive chemotherapySoil-transmitted helminthWomen of reproductive age

Identifiers

PMID38434235
PMCPMC10904898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.