Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38434219›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2024

Brain activation during processing of mouth actions in patients with disorders of consciousness.

Antonino Errante, Stefania Ferraro, Greta Demichelis, Chiara Pinardi, Mario Stanziano, Davide Sattin, Davide Rossi Sebastiano, Stefano Rozzi, Ludovico D'Incerti, Eleonora Catricalà and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonino ErranteDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0138-6369
Stefania FerraroMOE Key Laboratory for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 611731 Chengdu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5939-0459
Greta DemichelisNeuroradiology Unit, Diagnostic and Technology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Chiara PinardiHealth Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Mario StanzianoNeuroradiology Unit, Diagnostic and Technology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Davide SattinIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, 20138 Milan, Italy.
Davide Rossi SebastianoNeurophysiology Unit, Diagnostic and Technology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Stefano RozziDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy.
Ludovico D'IncertiNeuroradiology Unit, Children's Hospital A. Meyer-University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Eleonora CatricalàICoN Cognitive Neuroscience Center, IUSS, Institute for Advances Studies, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Matilde LeonardiDisability Unit and Coma Research Centre, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Maria Grazia BruzzoneNeuroradiology Unit, Diagnostic and Technology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Leonardo FogassiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy.
Anna NigriNeuroradiology Unit, Diagnostic and Technology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta · ITUniversity of Parma · ITIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITIstituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia · ITMeyer Children's Hospital · ITUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past 2 decades, several attempts have been made to promote a correct diagnosis and possible restorative interventions in patients suffering from disorders of consciousness. Sensory stimulation has been proved to be useful in sustaining the level of arousal/awareness and to improve behavioural responsiveness with a significant effect on oro-motor functions. Recently, action observation has been proposed as a stimulation strategy in patients with disorders of consciousness, based on neurophysiological evidence that the motor cortex can be activated not only during action execution but also when actions are merely observed in the absence of motor output, or during listening to action sounds and speech. This mechanism is provided by the activity of mirror neurons. In the present study, a group of patients with disorders of consciousness (11 males, 4 females; median age: 55 years; age range: 19-74 years) underwent task-based functional MRI in which they had, in one condition, to observe and listen to the sound of mouth actions, and in another condition, to listen to verbs with motor or abstract content. In order to verify the presence of residual activation of the mirror neuron system, the brain activations of patients were compared with that of a group of healthy individuals (seven males, eight females; median age: 33.4 years; age range: 24-65 years) performing the same tasks. The results show that brain activations were lower in patients with disorders of consciousness compared with controls, except for primary auditory areas. During the audiovisual task, 5 out of 15 patients with disorders of consciousness showed only residual activation of low-level visual and auditory areas. Activation of high-level parieto-premotor areas was present in six patients. During the listening task, three patients showed only low-level activations, and six patients activated also high-level areas. Interestingly, in both tasks, one patient with a clinical diagnosis of vegetative state showed activations of high-level areas. Region of interest analysis on blood oxygen level dependent signal change in temporal, parietal and premotor cortex revealed a significant linear relation with the level of clinical functioning, assessed with coma recovery scale-revised. We propose a classification of the patient's response based on the presence of low-level and high-level activations, combined with the patient's functional level. These findings support the use of action observation and listening as possible stimulation strategies in patients with disorders of consciousness and highlight the relevance of combined methods based on functional assessment and brain imaging to provide more detailed neuroanatomical specificity about residual activated areas at both cortical and subcortical levels.

Indexed as

action observationaction verbsdisorders of consciousnessfMRImirror neuron system

Identifiers

PMID38434219
PMCPMC10907975
OpenAlexW4391898875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.