ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2024
Large pericardial effusion in a woman in the second trimester of pregnancy: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac Tamponade in Late Pregnancy Caused byJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiac Tamponade Revealing a New Diagnosis of Malignancy: When Intervention Is the Answer.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- What is your next step? A case of large pericardial effusion during pregnancy.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Asymptomatic Chronic Large Pericardial Effusions: To Drain or to Observe?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pericardial effusion is common in pregnancy, with causes similar to the general population. Usually, it is found in the third trimester and disappears spontaneously after labour; however, there is a risk of progression to tamponade. Management is based on expert opinion, since few studies have been published. Case summary: A woman with enlargement of a known, chronic, presumably idiopathic pericardial effusion, in the 17th gestation week, presented with mild dyspnoea, without specific echocardiographic signs of cardiac tamponade. She received double antithrombotic treatment with aspirin 100 mg, started before conception, and a prophylactic dose of tinzaparin 4500 IU, started at the beginning of the pregnancy due to obstetrical antiphospholipid syndrome. A multidisciplinary team consisting of the treating obstetrician-gynaecologist, haematologist, cardiothoracic surgeon, and cardiologist discussed the management, taking into account the large size of the effusion and the significant increase during pregnancy, the possibility of further increase during the third trimester, the antiplatelet and antithrombotic treatment, which increased the haemorrhagic risk, and the difficulty and risk to intervene later in pregnancy. A surgical pericardial window was proposed to the patient and family and was performed uneventfully. Discussion: This case demonstrates the importance of a multidisciplinary team approach and shared decision-making in the management of these complex cardio-obstetric patients in order to achieve optimal therapeutic results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.