ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2024
Structured Workshop for Repair of High-Grade Perineal Lacerations Among Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents, The Need for Repetition and Retraining.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- IUGA International Guidelines on Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Obstetric Rectal Buttonhole Tear: Case Series, Literature Review, and Management Recommendations.International journal of women's health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of structured workshops in improving the knowledge and skills of obstetrics and gynecology residents for repairing high-grade perineal lacerations. Materials and methods: This quasi-experimental multicenter study evaluated the baseline knowledge of obstetrics and gynecology residents using an online patient-management problem (PMP) tool. After the initial evaluation, a workshop was conducted using sponge models to teach the practical technique for repairing high-grade perineal lacerations, including external and internal anal sphincter repair. The residents' knowledge was reassessed by PMP exams at 3 and 6 months after the workshop, and the scores were compared to the baseline statistics. Result: Eighty residents participated in the study, including 26, 22, and 32 at the first, second, and third-year levels of residency, respectively. The total PMP scores significantly improved after three months of the workshop, with an increasing total score from 15.5 (baseline) to 31.3 ( Conclusion: The study found that obstetrics and gynecology residents had substandard knowledge in repairing perineal lacerations. Although the training workshop significantly increased residents' knowledge, its effectiveness diminished over time, indicating a need for continuous or periodic training. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13224-023-01792-6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.