ArticleHeliyon2024
Left atrial appendage inversion: First computational study to shed light on the phenomenon.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Deceptive Shadow: Inverted Left Atrial Appendage Mimicking Thrombus After Infant Open Heart Surgery.Cureus · 2025Article
- Review
- The correlation between left atrial appendage morphology and thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation.Frontiers in stroke · 2025Review
- Investigating the pathophysiology and evolution of internal carotid dissection: a fluid-structure interaction simulation study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inversion of the left atrial appendage is a rare phenomenon, which may occur during the de-airing maneuvers associated to routinely performed surgery procedures, such as cardiopulmonary bypass or left ventricular assist device implantation. In this case, the body of the inverted appendage can obstruct the mitral valve leading to severe complications. The mechanisms are still poorly known, and more specific studies are needed to better understand its causes and identify mitigating strategies. The current study attempts to gain a better comprehension of the conditions and the factors favourable to left atrial appendage inversion. Four patient specific appendage morphologies, obtained from computerised tomography and representative of the main typologies commonly used for the appendage classification (chicken wing, cactus, cauliflower, and windsock), were used for the study. The numerical models were subjected to the same loading pattern, made of subsequent different pressure curves. Results show that the morphologies invert and recover their original anatomical configuration at different pressure loads, indicating that their tendency to invert is associated to their specific morphological features. Moreover, the analysis highlights that, although restoring the physiological left atrium pressure is not sufficient to induce appendage recovery, pressures well below the ventricular ones can induce the return to the natural configuration. All models recovered the anatomical configuration at pressures well below the ventricular pressure (about 100 mmHg), suggesting that basic trans-catheter maneuvers, e.g. producing temporary mitral regurgitation, could be attempted to correct the appendage configuration, prior to opt for more invasive surgical approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.