ArticleHeliyon2024
A novel machine learning-based imputation strategy for missing data in step-stress accelerated degradation test.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence of missing data is a significant data quality issue that negatively impacts the accuracy and reliability of data analysis. This issue is especially relevant in the context of accelerated tests, particularly for step-stress accelerated degradation tests. While missing data can occur due to objective factors or human error, high missing rate is an inevitable pattern of missing data that will occur during the conversion process of accelerated test data. This type of missing data manifests as a degradation dataset with unequal measuring intervals. Therefore, developing a more appropriate imputation method for accelerated test data is essential. In this study, we propose a novel hybrid imputation method that combines the LSSVM and RBF models to address missing data problems. A comparison is conducted between the proposed model and various traditional and machine learning imputation methods using simulation data, to justify the advantages of the proposed model over the existing methods. Finally, the proposed model is implemented on real degradation datasets of the super-luminescent diode (SLD) to validate its performance and effectiveness in dealing with missing data in step-stress accelerated degradation test. Additionally, due to the generalizability of the proposed method, it is expected to be applicable in other scenarios with high missing data rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.