ArticleHeliyon2024
Bone marrow stem cells with or without superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as a magnetic targeting tool: Which is better in regeneration of neurolysed facial nerve? An experimental study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Application of Magnetic Particles for Cell Targeting in Preclinical Animal Models: A Systematic Review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study was performed to evaluate neural regenerative capacities of bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) with or without superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) as a magnetic targeting tool after neurolysis of the facial nerve (FN) in albino rats. Methods: Thirty-eight male albino rats were selected. Two of them were euthanized for normal FN histology assessment. Thirty-six rats were injected with ethanol in the FN nerve for neurolysis induction and assessed one week post-operatively by eye blinking test. Animals were divided into three groups, each containing twelve rats: Group I (positive control) was injected with Dulbecco Modified Eagle's medium (DMEM-F12), group II was injected with BMSCs in DMEM-F12, and group III was injected with BMSCs in DMEM-F12 with poly l-lysine coated SPIONs (0.5 mmol/mL). Monitoring of SPIONs in the rat's body was carried out by MRI. A circular neodymium magnet N52 (0.57 T, 2 × 5 mm) was placed on each rat in group III just below the right ear at the site of surgery to attract SPIONs labeled BMSCs, left in place for 24 h, and then removed. From each group, six rats were euthanized at the end of the 4th and 8th week of treatment, respectively. The right FN trunks were extracted for routine histological examination using H&E stain. Immunohistochemical examination by anti-S100B was performed to characterize the thickness of the myelin sheath formed by the Schwann cells. Ultra-structural examination was performed to study changes in axons, myelin sheaths, and Schwann cells. Results: Regeneration of nerve fibers, Schwan cells, and myelin sheaths was better in group II than in groups I and III histologically, immunohistochemically, and ultra-structurally. Conclusion: BMSCs alone could ameliorate FN regeneration better than magnetic targeting treatment using BMSCs labeled with SPIONs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.