Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38433972›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Development and validation of a visualized prediction model for early miscarriage risk in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI procedures: a real-world multi-center study.

Meng Zhang, Xiaohui Ji, Xinye Hu, Yingying Zhu, Haozhe Ma, Hua Xu, Xiaolin La, Qingxue Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Meng Zhang *Reproductive Medicine Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaohui Ji *Reproductive Medicine Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xinye HuReproductive Medicine Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yingying ZhuDivision of Clinical Research Design, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Haozhe MaCenter of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Hua XuCenter of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Xiaolin LaCenter of Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.
Qingxue ZhangReproductive Medicine Center, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital · CNXinjiang Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study focuses on the risk of early miscarriage in patients undergoing Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 20,322 first cycles out of 31,307 for IVF/ICSI treatment at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital between January 2011 and December 2020. After excluding ineligible cycles, 6,724 first fresh cycles were included and randomly divided into a training dataset (n = 4,516) and an internal validation dataset (n = 2,208). An external dataset (n = 1,179) from another hospital was used for validation. Logistic and LASSO regression models identified risk factors, and a multivariable logistic regression constructed the nomogram. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Significant risk factors for early miscarriage were identified, including female age, BMI, number of spontaneous abortions, number of induced abortions and medical abortions, basal FSH levels, endometrial thickness on hCG day, and number of good quality embryos. The predictive nomogram demonstrated good fit and discriminatory power, with AUC values of 0.660, 0.640, and 0.615 for the training, internal validation, and external validation datasets, respectively. Calibration curves showed good consistency with actual outcomes, and DCA confirmed the clinical usefulness. Subgroup analysis revealed variations; for the elder subgroup (age ≥35 years), female age, basal FSH levels, and number of available embryos were significant risk factors, while for the younger subgroup (age <35 years), female age, BMI, number of spontaneous abortions, and number of good quality embryos were significant. Conclusions: Our study provides valuable insights into the impact factors of early miscarriage in both the general study population and specific age subgroups, offering practical recommendations for clinical practitioners. We have taken into account the significance of population differences and regional variations, ensuring the adaptability and relevance of our model across diverse populations. The user-friendly visualization of results and subgroup analysis further enhance the applicability and value of our research. These findings have significant implications for informed decision-making, allowing for individualized treatment strategies and the optimization of outcomes in IVF/ICSI patients.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousAdultFemaleFertilization in VitroFollicle Stimulating HormoneHumansMalePregnancyRetrospective StudiesSemenSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicFollicle Stimulating Hormoneearly miscarriageindividualized predictionIVF-ETnomogrampregnancy outcome

Identifiers

PMID38433972
PMCPMC10905617
OpenAlexW4391883028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.