ArticleiScience2024
Distance-weighted Sinkhorn loss for Alzheimer's disease classification.
Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- SLR: A Modified Logistic Regression Model with Sinkhorn Divergence for Alzheimer's Disease Classification.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025Article
- Generalizable self-supervised learning for brain CTA in acute stroke.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Reliability analysis of subsea manifold system using FMECA and FFTA.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional loss functions such as cross-entropy loss often quantify the penalty for each mis-classified training sample without adequately considering its distance from the ground truth class distribution in the feature space. Intuitively, the larger this distance is, the higher the penalty should be. With this observation, we propose a penalty called distance-weighted Sinkhorn (DWS) loss. For each mis-classified training sample (with predicted label
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.